Soldier escapes prison sentence because he?s 'too important to the army'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aleister crowley
    Banned
    • Nov 2011
    • 519

    #1

    Soldier escapes prison sentence because he?s 'too important to the army'

    ?Loutish? soldier escapes prison sentence because he?s 'too important to the army' despite string of convictions


    A soldier who battered two men outside a pub escaped prison - because he was deemed 'too important' to the Army.
    Private Daryl Wilkins, 22, lashed out at the men in a drunken rage just FIVE months after he walked free from court for hitting a police officer.
    Wilkins, from Nuneaton, who has a string of previous convictions for violent assaults, admitted affray after he punched a man and tried to stamp on his head.
    Private Daryl Wilkins, 22, lashed out at the men in a drunken rage just FIVE months after he walked free from court for hitting a police officer.
    Wilkins, from Nuneaton, who has a string of previous convictions for violent assaults, admitted affray after he punched a man and tried to stamp on his head.
    But he was let off again after a judge ruled he was 'too important' as a gunner in the Army.
    Judge Trevor Faber even admitted he was being 'far too lenient' when he sentenced Wilkins to just 95 hours of unpaid work at Warwick Crown Court.
    He also ordered him to pay ?1,500 court costs.
    Judge Faber told Wilkins: 'By rights, you ought to be going to prison. That is what you richly deserve.
    'Not very long after being given a chance by the magistrates, you are behaving in an identical way.
    'People are sick and tired when they go out at night and they are confronted by the sort of thing we have seen, you behaving in a loutish, thuggish way because you can?t control your drinking.
    'I am probably being far too lenient, but I am impressed by what you do in the Army and your importance to your unit.'
    The court heard Wilkins launched an unprovoked attack on two men outside the Bilberries pub in Nuneaton, Warks., on July 9 last year.
    CCTV footage captured Wilkins having an argument with his pregnant girlfriend before she stormed back into the pub.
    Wilkins then crossed the road and approached two men before punching one of them in the face, knocking him to the ground.
    Wilkins tried to stamp on the man?s head but was hauled back by the victim?s friend.
    A fight broke out and the two men suffered cuts and bruises.
    A police car arrived and when Wilkins was arrested he had blood on his hands and knuckles.
    Warren Stanier, prosecuting, told the court Wilkins had a string of convictions for violent assaults.
    He said: 'The defendant was given a caution in 2008 following a fight with fists and feet outside a Nuneaton nightclub, and in June 2010 he was given a community sentence for assaulting his partner and her mother.
    'Then in February last year he was back in court on two occasions, once for assaulting a police officer and once for two assaults in Bilberries pub, for which magistrates gave him a community sentence with 95 hours of unpaid work.'
    Judge Faber told Wilkins: 'I am just persuaded to take the only course I can, which is to punish you by making you do unpaid work.'
    Daryl Wilkins had been a private in the First Battalion Royal Regiment of Fusiliers for six years.

    Wilkins was due to go to Canada for pre-training before being deployed to Afghanistan next year.
    RRF Sgt Philip Anderson told Tuesday?s hearing Wilkins was a 'considerable asset' to his unit.
    He told the court the loss of one gunner out of four vehicles would be a 'massive shortfall.'
    He added that if Wilkins was jailed or given more than 100 hours unpaid work he would be sacked from the Army.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...tant-army.html

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    How exactly is a loutish, immature thug too important to the army?
    Are they trying to say that without this idiot the entire MOD would grind to a halt?
    So the Army are apparently incapable of replacing a single Private with a year's notice and why have they placed so much trust in a disgusting little thug with serious violence issues?
  • daithi
    V.I.P. Member
    • May 2009
    • 2586

    #2
    theres obviously someone higher up in the army giving a good word for him or else the judge wouldnt no how ~~~~ing important he is
    also a gunner private,,, i wouldnt exactly call it the most skilled important job in the world

    Comment

    • Johnner
      Admin Assistant
      • Jun 2010
      • 7069

      #3
      ~~~~er should have been jailed.I was nearly expecting him to be an intelligence officer from the description of the text.Bloody gunner ?
      Aaahh ! I love the smell of Eeprom in the morning...

      " We'll come in low out of the rising sun, and about a mile out, we'll put on the music . . . "

      Comment

      • aleister crowley
        Banned
        • Nov 2011
        • 519

        #4
        Originally posted by daithi55
        theres obviously someone higher up in the army giving a good word for him or else the judge wouldnt no how ~~~~ing important he is
        also a gunner private,,, i wouldnt exactly call it the most skilled important job in the world
        That's the point. Other decent hard working members of the army are being made redundant against his/her will and through no fault of their own. This guy is taking some or all of their salary under the false pretence of being a valuable human being.

        Comment

        • chalky 4
          DK Veteran
          • Dec 2008
          • 288

          #5
          Just shows he is good at his job. Need more like him to sort the xxxxx's out.
          Last edited by gmb45; 2 March, 2012, 08:04.

          Comment

          • rds60h
            DK Veteran
            • Nov 2008
            • 622

            #6
            Perhaps they are going to let the ~~~~er loose in Afganistan without a rifle and let him batter the b*****'s into submitting.

            Comment

            • cgscott
              V.I.P. Member
              • Jul 2008
              • 3513

              #7
              Whats wrong with what he done?
              sigpic


              Patience is a virtue.

              Comment

              • gc1966
                DK Veteran
                • Mar 2011
                • 2434

                #8
                Originally posted by cgscott
                Whats wrong with what he done?

                nothing if you consider it normal to beat up strangers when your pissed.

                personally i just fall to sleep with a kebab stain down my front
                does that make me un-manly??????

                Comment

                • manxspud
                  DK Veteran
                  • Jul 2009
                  • 1768

                  #9
                  The guy seems to have a history of assaulting people if you read down a bit further ' June 2010 he was given a community sentence for assaulting his partner and her mother.' So also thinks its ok to hit women ... **** sounds just like my brother

                  Anyway prison or Afghanistan ... Think the judge got this one right myself, not exactly going for a picnic in the park is he

                  Comment

                  • johnboy1974
                    DK Veteran
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 3418

                    #10
                    so what's it gonna take before they lock this animal up- does he need to kill someone??.

                    Comment

                    • Snowy79
                      DK Veteran
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 1347

                      #11
                      Judging by our prisons today he is going to suffer 100 times more in Afghanistan than in any jail. Prisoners would be after compensation if they had to live in the conditions he will be in. The guys a tit but maybe Afghanistan will rehabilitate him or kill him.

                      Comment

                      • skegsagypsy
                        DK Veteran
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 1230

                        #12
                        Nothing new in this story, there is history in criiminals being drafted into the army, this is a continuation of a long standing tradition!
                        'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.'
                        -Bishop Desmond Tutu

                        Comment

                        • johnboy1974
                          DK Veteran
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 3418

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Snowy79
                          Judging by our prisons today he is going to suffer 100 times more in Afghanistan than in any jail. Prisoners would be after compensation if they had to live in the conditions he will be in. The guys a tit but maybe Afghanistan will rehabilitate him or kill him.
                          Well if hes so important to the army do you think they will risk him on the front line- i think not. They will do a prince william on him and wrap him in cotton wool.

                          Comment

                          • TheCoder
                            DK Veteran
                            • Jun 2011
                            • 693

                            #14
                            Just a thought but 'Special forces' members are often described by their title before they joined the special group. No idea if thats the situation in this case but I cant really see any commanding officer sticking up for someone without some very good reason.

                            Comment

                            Working...