EU Vote eh ( and a poll )

**GastonJ** · 18th July, 2016, 09:49 AM

New PM and still no article 50 invoked. Maybe delay it until 2018 so that it's the next governments problem in 2020 if it all goes wrong eh....

**Meat-Head** · 18th July, 2016, 01:40 PM

Tweet and ask

**Meat-Head** · 23rd July, 2016, 12:53 PM

Here gaston read this, need to check my bicycle tires
https://mobile.twitter.com/ideas4the...9963098112?p=v

**Kalipo** · 12th September, 2016, 09:32 PM

Kalipo would of loved this thread if he'd of been here

**Meat-Head** · 13th September, 2016, 07:41 AM

Originally Posted by Kalipo

Kalipo would of loved this thread if he'd of been here

Have you been in gaol for electric/gas fraud????

**ifred** · 13th September, 2016, 08:09 AM

no Meaty his moniker tells all!!
ich bin stolz ein deutscher zu sein
The DK translation is "I've been an Stolen Germany I want money for it"

Looks like they found out gave him a temporary ban

**Meat-Head** · 3rd November, 2016, 11:28 PM

Didnt quite see the full snapchat. But may t prime minister, something abiut court
area 51 mp revolting, no idea

**GastonJ** · 4th November, 2016, 08:19 PM

There is no need to invoke article 50 to leave. The bloke who wrote article 50 has already said.

What appears to be the case is that May thinks she can just invoke it without referring it to parliament. I think the government is worried that if she has to take it to parliament that the MP's in there will want to know what she is or isn't doing, and people who don't have a f**king clue generally don't want to have to tell people what they're doing because they can't.

**Meat-Head** · 6th November, 2016, 10:35 AM

https://mobile.twitter.com/brexittru...2205103104?p=v

**GastonJ** · 25th November, 2016, 07:10 PM

Here you go, some light reading on the outcome of teh promises from the vote

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b085cf1ecec48a

**Meat-Head** · 5th December, 2016, 02:42 PM

Didnt quite catch details, something about pm hiding in toilet and saying no or something

**GastonJ** · 5th December, 2016, 02:50 PM

Nah, it's all to do with making promises that you know you'll never have to keep and getting the gullible

vote for what you want so you can further your own ambitions, while the people pay. As an example the fall in the pound is a direct result of the vote, it happened the same day. Now everything that's imported will cost more, inflation will rise (as it is) and the people will pay while MP's just claim more in expenses to cover the cost.

**Meat-Head** · 5th December, 2016, 07:33 PM

OFF TOPIC:-

the Eyetie PM has resigined and the italian grout has plumited agaibst the emerican dollar

**GastonJ** · 5th December, 2016, 07:42 PM

Banks and Hedge Funds be making money out of that, they never lose, just like b00kies

**GastonJ** · 23rd December, 2016, 03:39 PM

I guess another they want out is so that it's legal to mass collect internet network traffic.....

The UK government says it is "disappointed" after the European Court of Justice said the "indiscriminate" collection of data was against EU law.
EU judges said communications data could only be retained if it was used to fight serious crime.
Its verdict came after a legal challenge to the UK government's surveillance legislation.
The challenge was initially championed by Brexit Secretary David Davis, who was then a backbench Conservative MP.
The Lib Dems said the ruling proved the government had "overstepped the mark" with its Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act, branded the "snoopers' charter" by critics, which requires communications companies to retain data for 12 months.
The ECJ has ruled that a "general and indiscriminate retention" of data is against EU law and can only be done under certain conditions and "solely for the purpose of fighting serious crime".
Its ruling confirms a preliminary verdict in July. The case now returns to the UK Court of Appeal, which had referred the case to the ECJ for clarification.
Mr Davis, who had long campaigned on civil liberties issues, left the case after Theresa May appointed him to her cabinet in July.
Tom Watson, Labour's deputy leader, who is one of those bringing the case, said: "This ruling shows it's counter-productive to rush new laws through Parliament without a proper scrutiny."
The Home Office said it would be putting forward "robust arguments" to the Court of Appeal.
It added: "Given the importance of communications data to preventing and detecting crime, we will ensure plans are in place so that the police and other public authorities can continue to acquire such data in a way that is consistent with EU law and our obligation to protect the public."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-38390150

May has an excellent record of losing court cases, which I'm sure will continue to be the case. Hopefully she's not a trained solicitor or barrister