Log in

View Full Version : Pico ADC 212/3 any good for automotive use?



mini998
21st January, 2011, 10:24 AM
Hi all,
As the title says is it good for general automotive use? I'am interested in a used one .

Got no idea how much they worth these days ,Anybody got any idea? (without probes ,just the scope)

thanks

TR0UBLESH00TER
7th November, 2015, 04:35 PM
Latest version of Picoscope automotive software still support this old version .Did you bought it ?

Dunker
7th November, 2015, 11:21 PM
I use an ADC-212/100 with the automotive software. Works perfect.

I only wish the new automotive scopes from Pico were faster as I need them for non-auto purposes. The faster scopes from Pico are blocked in the automotive software. ~~~~ers. With the price of them I'd buying a Ditex for auto stuff and a Pico or whatever for faster stuff.

Meat-Head
8th November, 2015, 07:44 PM
What you mean blocked in auto dunker mate?

TR0UBLESH00TER
3rd August, 2016, 10:35 AM
How about using non-automotive Pico scopes with the automotive software ,works ?

Dunker
4th August, 2016, 11:55 PM
Nowadays apparently the automotive software only works with the automotive scopes (which are pretty slow by todays standards and not much use to me with their limited speed and functions) and not the faster fancier Pico scopes. Pain in the 4rse really. I'd have bought a new quicker Pico if the automotive software worked with it. Their loss. The Ditex 4 channel wireless automotive is impressive for the price. And the accessories are an awful lot cheaper than the Pico stuff. Although, the automotive Pico is far better. You get what you pay for....