View Full Version : Mercedes A160CDI W169 problem
omglol
21st September, 2013, 10:37 PM
Hello!
I wanted to tune my car (A160CDI W169), so a well-known tuner here did a job for me. The problem is there is no difference in performance, the car cannot accelerate over 170 km/h. Can somebody tell me why? There are no fault codes, of course.
ORI file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1pwqbh0dqern95f/1037389341.Bin
TUNED file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/c30yda0amj2giow/1037389341_tuned
Thanks!
morgano
21st September, 2013, 11:31 PM
And why you think tuned car will get higher top speed than original?
It should reach it faster, but unless you raise rpm limiter and/or vmax limiter and/or change gear relation top speed will be same.
Regards,
smayer
21st September, 2013, 11:56 PM
Hello!
I wanted to tune my car (A160CDI W169), so a well-known tuner here did a job for me. The problem is there is no difference in performance, the car cannot accelerate over 170 km/h. Can somebody tell me why? There are no fault codes, of course.
ORI file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1pwqbh0dqern95f/1037389341.Bin
TUNED file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/c30yda0amj2giow/1037389341_tuned
Thanks!
you pay to this files ? :roflmao:
omglol
21st September, 2013, 11:58 PM
Vmax limiter is removed. Car should have 120 hp, or so the tuner said. As I said, also performance is no better.
My other car - Fabia Combi 1.9 TDI 101hp (stock) beats this crappy A160CDI in no time ...
omglol
22nd September, 2013, 12:00 AM
you pay to this files ? :roflmao:
Yes, I paid for the first one when I bought the car (factory flashed the ECU, like usual). :D
And yes, I also paid for the second one.
smayer
22nd September, 2013, 12:10 AM
Driver wish = not modified
Geometry control = not modified
Boost limiter = not modified
Boost pressure = not modified
Torque = not modified
Driver whish max = 280 N, +- 50 mg fuel, rail pressure increased after 60mg
Conclusion, car have same power and torque as original.
Good news, you don?t demage engine with mod file.
omglol
22nd September, 2013, 12:13 AM
I was told the turbocharger was not touched in any way.
Strange thing is, that the guy who tuned this is a respected Digital Kaos member. I do not understand. :(
smayer
22nd September, 2013, 12:24 AM
I believe the guy is a respected member here, maybe don?t understend what you whant or maybe send you a file from another job, i supose you try solve the problem with tuner before post the problem here, what?s the answer about ?
omglol
22nd September, 2013, 12:24 AM
I forgot to add, he also made second file after I told him the first one is not good: https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5itcwjlrl8b5bv/1037389341_tuned_2
Smayer, could you check this one too? Thanks!
omglol
22nd September, 2013, 12:26 AM
I believe the guy is a respected member here, maybe don?t understend what you whant or maybe send you a file from another job, i supose you try solve the problem with tuner before post the problem here, what?s the answer about ?
The tuner does not respond on Skype (although he is online) or private messages anymore. :(
smayer
22nd September, 2013, 12:37 AM
whith second file the only change it?s more fuel after 250 Nm, all modified in %, 9& in torque fuel conversion table and 9% in rail pressure. But fuel it?s almost the same once it?s limites by smoke limiter via boost map.
666_devil
22nd September, 2013, 12:37 AM
Sorry but on this file still much work to do just ten maps changed...
omglol
22nd September, 2013, 12:40 AM
whith second file the only change it?s more fuel after 250 Nm, all modified in %, 9& in torque fuel conversion table and 9% in rail pressure. But fuel it?s almost the same once it?s limites by smoke limiter via boost map.
OK, many thanks for your time and cooperation!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.