PDA

View Full Version : mercedes 320 cdi edc15c6 tuning problem



jozoku1
13th September, 2016, 05:53 PM
Hi. I have problem with tuning files. Safe mode when kick down.
Mercedes 320 cdi, EDC15c6.
And rate my tune.

bobolin4o
14th September, 2016, 07:21 AM
And which DTCs you have after?

jozoku1
15th September, 2016, 08:18 AM
I was not looking. I was not thinking. Now is the stock map in the car. I'll try this weekend and report. Tnx Bobolin40 for replay.
Br

phl0at
15th September, 2016, 08:39 AM
Too rich mixture. Turbo maps totally wrong, IQ wrong, torque limiter wrong. In my opinion the problem is the RAIL PRESSURE. 50 bar is a bit too much for this one. Try it with 20 bar first, and never touch it again if it is ok. And the EGR maps are fulled with 12 000...leave it stock, and just blank it with a plate and delete the DTC it is better for this ECU, because 12000 does not mean the EGR is closed 100%.
BR.

juicewashere
4th November, 2016, 07:01 AM
The file looks right, there is no problem with the parametrs. What error do you have ?
EGR is also ok, i have this solution for EGR off with no problems or limp. How are your swirl flaps ?

dabu
4th November, 2016, 07:29 AM
attempt to manually change a little switch behind the accelerator pedal

jozoku1
21st December, 2016, 07:37 AM
Make new map. After some attempts car work good. TNX
Br

smirnoff_rules
21st December, 2016, 07:44 AM
phl0at

Too rich mixture. Turbo maps totally wrong, IQ wrong, torque limiter wrong. In my opinion the problem is the RAIL PRESSURE. 50 bar is a bit too much for this one. Try it with 20 bar first, and never touch it again if it is ok. And the EGR maps are fulled with 12 000...leave it stock, and just blank it with a plate and delete the DTC it is better for this ECU, because 12000 does not mean the EGR is closed 100%.
BR.



juicewashere

The file looks right, there is no problem with the parametrs. What error do you have ?
EGR is also ok, i have this solution for EGR off with no problems or limp. How are your swirl flaps ?
















how can 2 replies be so different about this map file ?