View Full Version : what's the best audio program linux?
fabio88
9th February, 2010, 05:34 AM
as from the title i require you....
I use audiomaster, but is not good for me..
kari
9th February, 2010, 01:15 PM
I use amarok
hackhain
12th February, 2010, 09:16 PM
Amarok is awesome for daily usage with its plug-ins! If you are looking professional record and/or remastering software like Cakewalk or Cubase. You should look specific distros in distrowatch.com or directly search in KDE or Gnome recent port tree...
jmcturnan
25th February, 2010, 09:29 PM
My favorite players are those that support OSS sound instead of PulseAudio. The sound quality improvement by switching to OSS is huge (15-20% improvement).
digital boy
5th March, 2010, 08:40 AM
Waiting for Midi support to be implemented in Ardour, then I'll dive in!
GastonJ
18th March, 2010, 07:41 PM
Have you tried xmms? Good program and been around years. Resembles winamp.
juetsing
28th May, 2010, 04:28 PM
Yes, the xmms works like winamp, and can write bash as scripts for it as a plugin... use pipe of linux, a perfect way... to play music.
iskrypelis
31st May, 2010, 08:14 AM
+1 for amarok. Using it for 3 years. Just dont like the new version, so still using older one - seems more informative and handful.
serafino
10th August, 2010, 08:55 AM
+amarok
awesomeness returned with version 2.3
xenoo1
11th August, 2010, 06:48 PM
as from the title i require you....
I use audiomaster, but is not good for me..
also use amarok or songbird
schmitz
13th August, 2010, 08:39 AM
amarok -the best.
hrabe
13th August, 2010, 10:38 AM
for editing and recording audacity...
for playback I use the amarok
kourkoutas
20th August, 2010, 10:22 PM
for playback i use amarok or rhythmbox.
for editing audacity
inflatable_raft
20th August, 2010, 11:05 PM
For editing of course audacity, but for playing - I don't know. I use amarok, but I don't like it really, as in my opinion the title database works somehow strange in regard to sorting etc. But I don't know a better one.
For playback of single tracks which are not mp3 I use vlc (yes, it's mainly for video) as vlc knows very much other codecs and I don't have to think about which player does play which codec.
Furax
26th August, 2010, 09:38 AM
i used to use xmms but changed over to audacious a while ago. Both are winamp type mp3 players.
If you are looking for an editing suite take a look at the apps in ubuntu studio
pepar
30th August, 2010, 09:50 PM
in my opinion is amarok the best prog for listening webradio...
fivthy
26th October, 2010, 03:34 PM
There's so many audio programs for linux so I'm gonna list a couple good ones:
Rhythmbox
Amarok
Exaile
Banshee
BMPx
Listen
XMMS
Quod Libet
You just have to try them out and then use the one that you feel most comfortable with.
I personally use Rhythmbox, it has all I need.
julio_m
12th November, 2010, 08:21 AM
For playback i use rhythmbox...
But after read this thread I am just curious: Has OSS better quality than Pulse Audio indeed?
kerpox
16th November, 2010, 04:32 AM
Hi,
I using for players sound cl?mentine is one light amarok.
It is very fun :
Downloads | Clementine Music Player (http://www.clementine-player.org/downloads)
For my ipod i using banshee.
Sam,
Guzzi123
17th November, 2010, 09:26 PM
VideoLAN - VLC media player - Open Source Multimedia Framework and Player (http://www.videolan.org/vlc/)
zinahe
23rd November, 2010, 01:44 PM
If you care about memory footprint then use
MPD + Sonata
or else just go with
Amarok
Regards,
Zinahe A.
trippleface
5th October, 2011, 06:52 AM
i would recommend either VLC Player or Banshee.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.