Bulld0gs Liverpool Thread

**thered** · 14th October, 2010, 08:56 AM

had a feeling it wasnt going to be the last that was heard from these two

~~~~ knows what power a poxy texan court has over our own HIGH court but whatever the legal wrangles are it looks set too run gillet and hicks are not going to give up till they got whatever they can get from this

it seems though they do have a point RBS (who in a sense part own liverpool FC) are not interested in gillet or hicks they seem only interested in recouping their ?280 milion that is owed to them which to be fair is understandable

but if the rumours that hicks n gillete are circulating about other offers at around ?400m are true it makes you wonder if they do have a valid point and is RBS running the show and who,what and why is benefitting from the deal

i think their is no smoke without fire and i wouldnt be surprised if a few execs at RBS and maybe messrs broughton purslow ect maybe getting their trousers lined by NESV

but thats only if what they say is true i suppose time will tell and we will see what today brings

hopefully its all sorted after the january window

**boomer39** · 14th October, 2010, 09:42 AM

Originally Posted by pillapow

Same reason you continually praise him............ No excuses now, Our season starts Sunday, Clean slate now, Fresh start. Roy can try again.

Old Roy is a figure of speech mate, If you took offence by it, I apologise, Its not you fault your old!!

cheeky get................btw never "praised" roy , just saying he has to be given a decent chance... maybe oldish... but full of wisdom!!!!!

**lfc4life** · 14th October, 2010, 11:40 AM

Do Mill Financial now own Liverpool? - Liverpool FC - LFC Online

**lfc4life** · 14th October, 2010, 12:15 PM

Punch a Mate, Boss, Ex, Celebrity.. Anyone! | Punch in the Face Book <<<< come and play this and get hicks beat up

**pillapow** · 14th October, 2010, 12:43 PM

Back to London High Courts at 2pm, I reckon justice floydd is livid that some cheeky yeehaw twat has over-ruled his decison.

**pillapow** · 14th October, 2010, 01:47 PM

Originally Posted by flyingpig

And at the moment it is the way round that I have said, coz they have the injuction. LFC don't. IT cannot now be sold until this has been removed.

Hicks injuction is invalid british judge ruled him not to interferewith sale which is exactly what he has done, He will now be held in contempt of court. (hopfully)

**pillapow** · 14th October, 2010, 03:07 PM

**** me they're at it again in texas court........ Jokers.

**dctyper** · 14th October, 2010, 05:02 PM

all this stuff on the news is doing my head in. wtf are the board doing rejecting a bid from lim? sorry, not reject. ignore!!! surely they should keep all options open? its starting to look a bit fishy tbh

dc

**macjst35** · 14th October, 2010, 05:33 PM

The judge at the high court Rules
Judge rules that anti-suit injunction wanted by RBS and other parties (board) against owner's action in Texas is granted. "This case has nothing to do with Texas."

GET IT TOM HICKS, DO ONE !

**wongers** · 14th October, 2010, 06:42 PM

don't count your chickens yet the slippery b*stard is back in court now so stand by

**Koopatroopa07** · 14th October, 2010, 06:45 PM

Low times for the pool, but as much as they blame the owners, they should probably look at the 50 plus players they have bought over the last 4 years that wouldn't get in to Arsenal, Chelsea and Man U. Torres and Reina aside.

**Bulld0g** · 14th October, 2010, 06:53 PM

Not Gerrard ? It's the players fault we are where we are but it is a large part the owners fault. We have made a profit over the last three years because the owners wont give money to spend, plain and simple.