Mini cooper s remote 04

[MrSporty]

Hi myexige

Could you do this one for a Mini:

3A1312

Thanks

[ninja123]

hi mate, so all these remotes will work on mini, rover and lr, but the code needed is different?

cheers, ninja

[myexige]

hi mate, so all these remotes will work on mini, rover and lr, but the code needed is different?

cheers, ninja

Yep, thats correct

[myexige]

Hi myexige

Could you do this one for a Mini:

3A1312

Thanks

Code for the mini is

*X3A13123A1311FFG*
*FFFFFFFFC5ECEDI*

Regards

[mscanii]

Hi myexige

Please help for a Mini:

38866E
08/10/03

Thanks

[myexige]

*X38866E38866DFFN*
*FFFFFFFFC77991-*

[malczykos]

Please BAR CODE:
For Rover 75 and for Mini
1.
356739
15/05/03

2.
3E5EF8
25/03/05

3.
28A46F
07/03/01

4.
3EDB72
16/01/06

5. This is for MINI
24902C
02/12/99

THANX
Regards

[myexige]

Please BAR CODE:
For Rover 75 and for Mini
1.
356739
15/05/03

2.
3E5EF8
25/03/05

3.
28A46F
07/03/01

4.
3EDB72
16/01/06

5. This is for MINI
24902C
02/12/99

THANX
Regards

1.
356739
15/05/03

*N356739356738FFW*
*FFFFFFFFCA98C65*

2.
3E5EF8
25/03/05

*N3E5EF83E5EF7FF+*
*FFFFFFFFC1A107M*

3.
28A46F
07/03/01

*N28A46F28A46EFFD*
*FFFFFFFFD75B90-*

4.
3EDB72
16/01/06

*N3EDB723EDB71FFN*
*FFFFFFFFC1248DV*

5. This is for MINI
24902C
02/12/99

*X24902C24902BFFY*
*FFFFFFFFDB6FD39*


Hmmm i do think this amount may be taking the p*ss slighty!

[malczykos]

Thank you very much.
I tested and report.

Regards

[paul_12345]

Would I be correct in saying anyone can change the code to mini/rover by just changing the X->N N->X without changing the checksum.

Also can the checksum be any printable char or just numbers and uppercase letters I assume - 'o' and -+? or is that saying too much

[myexige]

No, not correct, the checksum does change too.
It can be 0-9, a-z plus a few others including a space character!
You need different codes for UK MGR, LR, Mini, different codes for Non UK MGR,LR and Mini, different codes if they are 433Mhz or 315Mhz versions and a different code for LR SLS remote!

[paul_12345]

Well I'm bored trying to figure it out so will post what I've found.

take the example
24902C
02/12/99

*X24902C24902BFFY*
*FFFFFFFFDB6FD39*

First letter of the first line represents the car make.
The next 3 bytes are the code from the label 24902C
The next 3 bytes are the code again -1
The next byte seems to be always FF.
The last char I assume is a checksum for the first line??

The bottom string is FFFFFFFFFFFFFF minus the code from the label in this case FFFFFFFFFFFFFF - 24902C = FFFFFFFFDB6FD3 then the last char I assume the checksum.

I did think the FF were there to pad the first string to 7 bytes for checksum use, and that one bit could be taken from each byte giving a max value of 0..127 which could be represented by all the printable characters but may be not

[gtmech]

Fantastic post paul_12345, keep up the good work, thanks for sharing

Well I'm bored trying to figure it out so will post what I've found.

take the example
24902C
02/12/99

*X24902C24902BFFY*
*FFFFFFFFDB6FD39*

First letter of the first line represents the car make.
The next 3 bytes are the code from the label 24902C
The next 3 bytes are the code again -1
The next byte seems to be always FF.
The last char I assume is a checksum for the first line??

The bottom string is FFFFFFFFFFFFFF minus the code from the label in this case FFFFFFFFFFFFFF - 24902C = FFFFFFFFDB6FD3 then the last char I assume the checksum.

I did think the FF were there to pad the first string to 7 bytes for checksum use, and that one bit could be taken from each byte giving a max value of 0..127 which could be represented by all the printable characters but may be not

[Master01]

đđĐđß$đĐßđßđßđđääđłldkf>>;*;ßßߤߤ;>>;>ßߤ]$ß$÷÷×ßß]¤¤¤]ß$$[ß[¤ĐĐß[ß...

[malczykos]

I confirm, codes 100% OK. Tested on the MINI.