Mercedes A160CDI W169 problem

[omglol]

Hello!

I wanted to tune my car (A160CDI W169), so a well-known tuner here did a job for me. The problem is there is no difference in performance, the car cannot accelerate over 170 km/h. Can somebody tell me why? There are no fault codes, of course.

ORI file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1pwqbh0dqe...1037389341.Bin
TUNED file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/c30yda0amj...37389341_tuned

Thanks!

[morgano]

And why you think tuned car will get higher top speed than original?

It should reach it faster, but unless you raise rpm limiter and/or vmax limiter and/or change gear relation top speed will be same.


Regards,

[smayer]

Hello!

I wanted to tune my car (A160CDI W169), so a well-known tuner here did a job for me. The problem is there is no difference in performance, the car cannot accelerate over 170 km/h. Can somebody tell me why? There are no fault codes, of course.

ORI file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/1pwqbh0dqe...1037389341.Bin
TUNED file: https://www.dropbox.com/s/c30yda0amj...37389341_tuned

Thanks!

you pay to this files ?

[omglol]

Vmax limiter is removed. Car should have 120 hp, or so the tuner said. As I said, also performance is no better.

My other car - Fabia Combi 1.9 TDI 101hp (stock) beats this crappy A160CDI in no time ...

[omglol]

you pay to this files ?

Yes, I paid for the first one when I bought the car (factory flashed the ECU, like usual).

And yes, I also paid for the second one.

[smayer]

Driver wish = not modified
Geometry control = not modified
Boost limiter = not modified
Boost pressure = not modified
Torque = not modified
Driver whish max = 280 N, +- 50 mg fuel, rail pressure increased after 60mg
Conclusion, car have same power and torque as original.
Good news, you don?t demage engine with mod file.

[omglol]

I was told the turbocharger was not touched in any way.

Strange thing is, that the guy who tuned this is a respected Digital Kaos member. I do not understand.

[smayer]

I believe the guy is a respected member here, maybe don?t understend what you whant or maybe send you a file from another job, i supose you try solve the problem with tuner before post the problem here, what?s the answer about ?

[omglol]

I forgot to add, he also made second file after I told him the first one is not good: https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5itcwjlrl...389341_tuned_2

Smayer, could you check this one too? Thanks!

[omglol]

I believe the guy is a respected member here, maybe don?t understend what you whant or maybe send you a file from another job, i supose you try solve the problem with tuner before post the problem here, what?s the answer about ?

The tuner does not respond on Skype (although he is online) or private messages anymore.

[smayer]

whith second file the only change it?s more fuel after 250 Nm, all modified in %, 9& in torque fuel conversion table and 9% in rail pressure. But fuel it?s almost the same once it?s limites by smoke limiter via boost map.

[666_devil]

Sorry but on this file still much work to do just ten maps changed...

[omglol]

whith second file the only change it?s more fuel after 250 Nm, all modified in %, 9& in torque fuel conversion table and 9% in rail pressure. But fuel it?s almost the same once it?s limites by smoke limiter via boost map.

OK, many thanks for your time and cooperation!