Let's not get too confused. Iprod's coding he posted initially from his side for you is absolutely fine. You can can live with that perfectly. Do not play around if you get that one written to the unit! There's only the 1ZA thing that does not match and it affects byte zero,... and another byte according to that. But now that you say that is not accepted suprises me,... since it is part of what is not checked by the unit while writing the coding. Could only explain, that this older unit does not know this parameter set, even though your PR number points to it. Probably it didn't exist in this software... weird to me.
Anyways. Before starting struggle here, use Iprots coding please, as it is super accurate in terms of everything else. Do not modify it. Just use it as it is. It's only that one thing not quite clear, and in my opinion, doubtable case I mentioned. But you or whoever drives the car can live with that as the effect should be rather small.
Would still be a nice move to check again whether the coding I sent you can be written and was just rejected due to some other unforseen things.
Aaaaand my two cents besides that: me using a smiley together with a little friendly joke, means it is a friendly joke

Wink wink

Just don't wann be misunderstood.
Bookmarks