Register
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 19 of 19
  1. #16
    DK Veteran
    Junkyard Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Location
    EUROPE
    Posts
    1,082
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    360
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    303
    Thanked in
    256 Posts

    Default

    - - - - - - - - - -
    Last edited by Junkyard Dog; 31st May, 2020 at 08:12 PM.

  2. #17
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    18
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DiegoStud View Post

    Here's a little formula you can play with: AIR MASS =((BOOST-(6.1078*10^(7.5*TEMP/(TEMP+237.3))*HUMIDITY))*100*VOLUME/(R_CONST*(273.15+TEMP)))*VE.
    BOOST in mbar
    R_CONST=287.058
    HUMIDITY= relative in decimal percentage eg 78%= 0.78
    TEMP= in C
    VOLUME in cc=1968/4= 492
    VE= decimal percentage eg 90%= 0.90
    Ok, but what is unit output of this air mass computing formula.
    Made compute with inputs: 2400mbar as boost, 0,9 VE, 0,78 hum, 20*C, and 1968ccm volume, but the output result is nonsens to me: 5013,10235... and what is that?! I tried to different conversions, but none of them gave me any even near to good, understandable results. I thought also about 5013,10235 is corrected volume of cyl, but it doesnt make sense to me and all next maths looks like wishful thinking and cherry picking, doesn't happy me.

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    DiegoStud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    295
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    179
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    286
    Thanked in
    206 Posts

    Default

    Well hello,

    I suppose you are right; I omitted to include Airmass is specified in mg/stroke. Given every other unit is in metric, and this is a thread regarding EDC16 where airmass per cylinder has always been specified in mg/stroke, that ought to have been self evident.

    You could use 492 instead of 1968, as it would appear I did write 1968 divided by 4 in the above quote. Or, at least now you know what the answer would be if your engine were 4 times larger.

    Not my problem if it doesn't make sense beyond that, but the laws of physics still apply where I live.

  4. #19
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    18
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    3
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    1
    Thanked in
    1 Post

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DiegoStud View Post
    Not my problem if it doesn't make sense beyond that, but the laws of physics still apply where I live.
    Hehee.. of course, you are right. Was my fault. I discovered the answer of my question next day having fresh head and free time to think about it - I was tired, sorry. And moreover forgot to write it here, but maybe it's good. It might be we will help with that for someone else. Thanks for the response.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.