Register
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 55 of 55
  1. #46
    Top Poster +

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    239
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    97
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Default

    No help diego ???

  2. #47
    Senior Member
    DiegoStud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    163
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    276
    Thanked in
    201 Posts

    Default

    Too busy to give as complete an answer as I would wish, but here are the salient points:
    Smoke/Lambda issues- Smoke map was a CR170 not PD- common rail can run richer than PD for a given smoke limit and 16V better breathing. You can have as big a gap as you wish, values in between are interpolated.
    If you want to run leaner, then reduce the figures.
    At the same time, 1.3 lambda makes no sense when to spool a 1756- this is the whole reason why smoke limits are a map and not a single figure, or a flat lined map such as you have initially made. Richer lambda will increase pre-turbine exhaust enthalpy, thereby work that can be performed on the turbine, meaning target boost setpoint can be acheived quicker and then once spooled lambda can be leaned out again. Think more 1.1-1.15 lambda at lower IQ and RPM to initially spool. Worth noting on your log boost only meets specified ~3100rpm. Boost following the green line on the graph as shown would be less aggressive and yet still meet specified by ~2600rpm.
    Boost log.jpg

    N75 issues- are you changing the right values? Look at IQ in your log and compare to your N75 map. ~60mg? 33-21%? PID is doing a good job keeping you up above 40%. Why does your N75 map reduce as IQ reduces?

    Nice to hear you've got Lambda limitation functioning- well done.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DiegoStud For This Useful Post:

    Meat-Head (10th February, 2020), vwstuff (10th February, 2020)

  4. #48
    Top Poster +

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    239
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    97
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Default

    Thank for your feedback, help and time !!!
    I will try to correct my boost curve as much as possible according to you green line sugestion , for this purpose I focus only on the 2 main maps : 19118A and 1EC564 maybe i'm wrong ?
    The only raison I whish to increase boost at top end is for lower egt.
    In the range of 1.1-1.15 I'm still over 800 °C... my bad
    750 °C will be fine i guess
    Unfortunatly, 02 sensor full load don't see to working properly .
    I think another trick is necessary to put it on.
    Maybe smoke map MAP need to be blanked just an hypothesis...who know ?!
    Last edited by vwstuff; 10th February, 2020 at 07:26 PM.

  5. #49
    V.I.P. Member
    Meat-Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Meatheadshire (Between London and Scotland)
    Posts
    31,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,823
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,053
    Thanked in
    4,770 Posts

    Default

    Just to add to this, can you add somekind of feeder tube into that exhaust so when your over 666 deg c
    you can drop into another bath mounted on rear bumper some freshly smelted aluminium ingots.

    then every 20 miles sell the ingots at every fuel station for diesel

    Was Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Meat-Head For This Useful Post:

    DiegoStud (10th February, 2020), rideon (28th February, 2020), vwstuff (11th February, 2020)

  7. #50
    Top Poster +

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    239
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    97
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Default

    I read the text below on vw tdi forum what do you think about it Diego ?
    Maybe full load LSU is in close loop with MAF ?
    In other world LSU full load mode will work only in edc 16 MAF mod ?


    ---------------------

    One more function. Full-load Smoke Limitation. This is the oh-so familiar smoke map which is implemented with the MAF on the older engines. (And actually, I assume that the MAF is still used in EDC16 in a inner-outer loop setup similar to the EGR control). Basically, the A/F ratio is directly related to smoke number (how much smoke the engine puts out). The lower the A/F ratio, the higher the smoke number. There's an internal limit in the ECU as to how much smoke the engine can put out... and if the measured A/F ratio drops below the stored A/F ratio related to that smoke limit, the ECU will reduce fueling.

    ----------------------------

  8. #51
    Senior Member
    DiegoStud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    163
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    276
    Thanked in
    201 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by vwstuff View Post
    I read the text below on vw tdi forum what do you think about it Diego ?
    Maybe full load LSU is in close loop with MAF ?
    In other world LSU full load mode will work only in edc 16 MAF mod ?
    Yes it is in closed loop with MAF- MAF determines what the target lambda should be (outer loop as he calls it) as the lambda maps use an airflow axis based on mAirPerCyl from MAF, and LSU provides feedback to account for any deviation therefore closing the loop. There is no need to blank any maps, switches will correctly select what it will use.

    Regardless, your MAF readings bear no resemblance to what your engine is breathing thus rendering all the above defunct.
    As I see it the reason you are trying control lambda is really to control EGT- instead of trying to set up an extremely diffcult lambda control, why not deal with EGT directly and use the EGT limiters?

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DiegoStud For This Useful Post:

    Meat-Head (2nd March, 2020), vwstuff (4th March, 2020)

  10. #52
    Top Poster +

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    239
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    97
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Default

    Do you mean to move the max stock egt limiter over 800 °C
    This is not really safe ???

  11. #53
    Senior Member
    DiegoStud's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    283
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    163
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    276
    Thanked in
    201 Posts

    Default

    Raising limiters wouldn't keep it under control now would it?
    What I'm saying is if you are hitting the EGT limiter so quickly you have a choice to make: increase boost, reduce fuel in torque limiter or let the EGT limiter reduce it for you.
    Smoke limitation in whatever form, be it MAF or MAP, is for controlling minimum acceptable lambda under transient conditions- ie short bursts.
    If you want to keep aluminium ingot consumption under control you can't afford to be driving on your smoke limiter- it isn't designed to do so.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DiegoStud For This Useful Post:

    Meat-Head (7th March, 2020), vwstuff (10th March, 2020)

  13. #54
    V.I.P. Member
    Meat-Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Meatheadshire (Between London and Scotland)
    Posts
    31,904
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    8,823
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    6,053
    Thanked in
    4,770 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DiegoStud View Post
    If you want to keep aluminium ingot consumption under control

    Excuse my ignorance of being just a leecher, do you not mean “aluminium ingot PRODUCTION” rather than
    consumstion

    great post there

    Was Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

  14. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Meat-Head For This Useful Post:

    DiegoStud (7th March, 2020), vwstuff (10th March, 2020)

  15. #55
    Top Poster +

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    239
    Thanks Thanks Given 
    97
    Thanks Thanks Received 
    15
    Thanked in
    14 Posts

    Default

    Nothing is under control ...
    Now I better understand the way edc16 work thanks to Diego !!
    A this time, I stop the remap process to work on hardware ( intercooling , intake manifold, turbo efficiency ) .
    My goal is to lower egt !!!
    So I stop momently aluminium ingot production

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to vwstuff For This Useful Post:

    DiegoStud (10th March, 2020)

 

 
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
This website uses cookies
We use cookies to store session information to facilitate remembering your login information, to allow you to save website preferences, to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners.