Autohex or Abrites for BMW

[atomiczen]

Which tools is better for bmw coding and programming?
Autohex II or Abrites?

[ricked]

you forgot to mention BMW explorer

[atomiczen]

you forgot to mention BMW explorer

right, have you good experiences with it?

[depredator]

good question, to make Autohex module programming it is very good but it does not let you choose the calibration that you want to use, it directly loads the one that you think is most convenient, and many times that is not enough, you can use the original BMW soft with Autohex Also, but for that you have to have it full and the cost is very high, AVDI is very unstable, even more so when you want to make programming in the car, I would prefer to do it in a bank as much as possible, but if it gives the possibility of changing the calibrations This is very useful when you want to recover a corrupt module, since you can change the calibrations until you find the most suitable one for your problem, with respect to the number of supported modules. Autohex has more covered modules, in my opinion Autohex is much more stable, although it does not mean that I have not nailed any CAS when I reflashed it, which I could only recover later with AVDI ... Anyway, I hope my experience will help you