SMGO 221 (unregistered)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • TEDSON
    Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 45

    #1

    SMGO 221 (unregistered)

    Hi, this is not about the unregistered error.

    Well not really, my question is, if I upgrade to this firmware and for some reason its unregistered, will I still get the basic UK old terrestrial channels like I am now, or am I buggered until a new firmware is released?

    I'm not asking for what should or might happen, I'm hoping for people who have tried and know for sure to reply.
    __________________________________________________ ___

    If you have looked in this thread about the unregistered error..
    I see many threads about this, but all of them just say, "read the other threads", catch 22.

    I seen an answer in the main starview firmware thread but cannot remember what page. But the ones with unregistered in the title do not appear to address the question as I said above, so you may be wasting your time, read the later pages of the firmware thread.
    Last edited by TEDSON; 12 June, 2011, 14:46.
  • wass123
    Newbie
    • Jun 2011
    • 1

    #2
    did u however manage to sort out the unregistered problem as i am still experiencing that ?

    Comment

    • snedz1967
      Banned
      • May 2011
      • 197

      #3
      no fix untill the kiddy get us sorted so many pointless threads abt the same thing can moderators remove aw threads like this

      Comment

      • badger23
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2010
        • 24

        #4
        quite a few people are having same problem

        the only advise i have been given is to contact your supplier and ask him to register the box with starview .. but after saying that i have also read that it is a problem with starviews server not enough capacity for every one my box has never worked on any software all the other boxes i bought for my friends and family work fine i am woundering if i have ended up with a clone

        Comment

        • TEDSON
          Member
          • Dec 2008
          • 45

          #5
          Originally posted by snedz1967
          no fix untill the kiddy get us sorted so many pointless threads abt the same thing can moderators remove aw threads like this
          Wut ?

          Care to link me to this question anywhere pal? because I did search.

          Comment

          • Federer16
            DK Veteran
            • Mar 2011
            • 450

            #6
            My SV6 displays Unregistered box.

            But...I can still view FTA channels like BBC/ITV/Channel 4/Channel 5, nothing more.

            Comment

            • snedz1967
              Banned
              • May 2011
              • 197

              #7

              Comment

              • willo1961
                Member
                • Jul 2010
                • 44

                #8
                Originally posted by TEDSON
                Hi, this is not about the unregistered error.

                Well not really, my question is, if I upgrade to this firmware and for some reason its unregistered, will I still get the basic UK old terrestrial channels like I am now, or am I buggered until a new firmware is released?

                I'm not asking for what should or might happen, I'm hoping for people who have tried and know for sure to reply.
                __________________________________________________ ___

                If you have looked in this thread about the unregistered error..
                I see many threads about this, but all of them just say, "read the other threads", catch 22.

                I seen an answer in the main starview firmware thread but cannot remember what page. But the ones with unregistered in the title do not appear to address the question as I said above, so you may be wasting your time, read the later pages of the firmware thread.
                If you want to watch the free channels without the "not registered box" keep popping up, you need to downgrade back to SMGO 2.12

                Comment

                • TEDSON
                  Member
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 45

                  #9
                  @ Federer16, thanks pal

                  @snedz1967 you just confirmed you did'nt really understand my question. Best of luck with your concentration in the future.

                  Comment

                  • TEDSON
                    Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 45

                    #10
                    Thanks willo1961

                    Comment

                    • snedz1967
                      Banned
                      • May 2011
                      • 197

                      #11
                      Originally posted by TEDSON
                      @ Federer16, thanks pal

                      @snedz1967 you just confirmed you did'nt really understand my question. Best of luck with your concentration in the future.
                      aye nae probs

                      Comment

                      • TEDSON
                        Member
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 45

                        #12
                        haha

                        Well I know now to have both images on my stick before trying the 221.

                        Thanks all.

                        Comment

                        • TEDSON
                          Member
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 45

                          #13
                          For the record, 221 worked fine for me.

                          Thanks author.

                          Comment

                          Working...