Advice from tech support...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • manxspud
    DK Veteran
    • Jul 2009
    • 1768

    #1

    Advice from tech support...

    Dear Tech Support:

    Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a slow down in the performance of the flower and jewelry applications that had operated flawlessly under the Boyfriend 5.0 system.

    In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as Romance 9.9, but installed undesirable programs such as NFL 7.4, NBA 3.2 and NHL 4.1. Conversation 8.0 also no longer runs and Housecleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. I've tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail. What can I do?

    Signed,

    Desperate

    ***************************

    Dear Desperate:

    First, keep in mind that Boyfriend 5.0 was an entertainment package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Try to enter the command C:/I THOUGHT YOU LOVED ME and install Tears 6.2. Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications: Guilt 3.3 and Flowers 7.5.

    But remember, overuse can cause Husband 1.0 to default to such background applications as Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0, or Beer 6.1. Please remember that Beer 6.1 is a very bad program that will create SnoringLoudly.WAV files. DO NOT install Mother-In-Law 1.0 or reinstall another Boyfriend program. These are not supported applications and will crash Husband 1.0.

    It could also potentially cause Husband 1.0 to default to the program: Girlfriend 9.2, which runs in the background and has been known to introduce potentially serious viruses into the Operating System.

    In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have a limited memory and can't learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to enhance his system performance. I personally recommend Hot Food 3.0 and Single Malt Scotch 4.5 combined with such applications as Boob Job 3.6D and that old standby...Lingerie 6.9 (which have both been credited with improved performance of his hardware).

    Good Luck,

    Tech Support

  • bvilleuk
    DK Veteran
    • Aug 2009
    • 625

    #2
    Originally posted by manxspud
    Dear Tech Support:

    Good Luck,

    Tech Support

    Similarly, the incorporation of additional mission constraints adds
    overriding performance constraints to any discrete configuration mode.
    In respect to specific goals, the fully integrated test programme adds
    overriding performance constraints to the structural design based on
    system engineering concepts.
    For example, initiation of critical subsystem development adds overriding
    performance constraints to the sophisticated hardware.
    For example, a large portion of the interface coordination communication adds
    overriding performance constraints to the structural design based on system
    engineering concepts. In particular, initiation of critical subsystem
    development adds overriding performance constraints to the total system
    rationale.
    In this regard, a large portion of the interface coordination communication
    adds overriding performance constraints to any discrete configuration mode.
    Similarly, a primary inter-relationship between system and/or subsystem
    technologies adds overriding performance constraints to the greater
    fightworthiness concept.
    For example, a primary inter-relationship between system and/or subsystem
    technologies adds overriding performance constraints to the structural
    design based on system engineering concepts.
    Based on integral sub-system considerations, the fully integrated test
    programme adds overriding performance constraints to the sophisticated
    hardware.

    So there.
    .
    .
    WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
    .
    CAPITAL !!
    .
    BRING IT BACK...............
    .
    .

    Comment

    • manxspud
      DK Veteran
      • Jul 2009
      • 1768

      #3


      @manx.

      Comment

      • bvilleuk
        DK Veteran
        • Aug 2009
        • 625

        #4
        Originally posted by manxspud


        @manx.
        Sorry maybe I should have made it a bit clearer.... Here goes

        Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence
        univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The
        precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in "self-alienation," not "self-identity, itself in self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and "actual other," "itself," not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).

        Hope this clears things up
        .
        .
        WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
        .
        CAPITAL !!
        .
        BRING IT BACK...............
        .
        .

        Comment

        • manxspud
          DK Veteran
          • Jul 2009
          • 1768

          #5
          Well why did you not say so in the 1st place...




          Keep em comming...

          Comment

          • bvilleuk
            DK Veteran
            • Aug 2009
            • 625

            #6
            Originally posted by manxspud
            Well why did you not say so in the 1st place...
            I knew there would be someone intelligent reading this post -- can you explain to me what on earth it means

            .
            .
            WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
            .
            CAPITAL !!
            .
            BRING IT BACK...............
            .
            .

            Comment

            • manxspud
              DK Veteran
              • Jul 2009
              • 1768

              #7
              Do as the gif says.... then it all makes sense...



              Good luck @manx.

              Comment

              Working...