Court orders O2 to 'hand over' details of 9,000 users...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gmb45
    Admin Assistant
    • Nov 2008
    • 7538

    #1

    Court orders O2 to 'hand over' details of 9,000 users...

    ...accused of downloading ~~~~ films from 'Ben Dover Productions'

    wait till the blokes missus sees the letters

    High Court case: Lindsay Honey, aka Ben Dover, complained that O2 customers had pirated his films

    Personal details of 9,124 O2 internet users accused of illegally downloading ~~~~ography are to be handed over to adult entertainment firms Golden Eye International and Ben Dover Productions.

    The High Court ordered the release of the contact details after a claim by the ~~~~ography makers that the O2 customers had pirated their films.

    Both firms are run by Lindsay Honey, who uses Ben Dover as a pseudonym.

    The court, however, quashed his intention to write to each end user demanding a payment of ?700 in damages.

    The judge indicated that bill-payers are not liable for copyright infringement automatically just because their internet connection was used for the download.

    The court will decide at a later date how Mr Honey will be able to word correspondence to the users.

    Mike O?Connor, CEO of Consumer Focus, acted on behalf of the O2 customers.

    He told the court: ?It is very welcome that the court has recognised the bill-payer should not be automatically assumed to be guilty when a copyright owner believes they have detected copyright infringement on that internet connection.

    ?Consumers should not be subject to the type of threatening letters Golden Eye intended to send to more than 9,000 O2 customers.?

    The judge, in handing victory to Ben Dover Productions, the judge said: ?The claimants' interests in enforcing their copyrights outweigh the intended defendants' interest in protecting their privacy and data protection rights.?

    Details of O2 users will be handed over to Ben Dover Productions

    The case follows the failed court challenge from BT and TalkTalk against controversial measures intended to curb illegal internet file-sharing.

    The companies had asked Court of Appeal judges to overturn an earlier ruling backing the Government's action to tackle copyright infringement online.

    The creative industries estimate the practice is costing them some ?400million a year, especially with regard to films, music and books.

    But BT and TalkTalk, which are two of the UK's largest internet service providers (ISPs), say the proposed measures are incompatible with EU law and oppose them on a number of technical grounds.

    Their lawyers also argued at an appeal court hearing in January that the measures would result in an invasion of privacy and run up disproportionate costs for ISPs and consumers.

    The legal setback came as BT and TalkTalk were accused of turning a blind eye to illegal downloads after an undercover investigation.
    ------------------------------------
    O2 to 'hand over' details of users accused of downloading ~~~~ films from 'Ben Dover Productions' | Mail Online
    support mountain resue

    support digital-kaos here


    forum rules

    no keygens or torrents to be posted no autodata discussions

    pish pt walkers


  • Captin
    Top Poster
    • Mar 2010
    • 129

    #2
    And so it starts.

    "Opinions are like arseholes. Everybody's got one and everyone thinks everyone else's stinks."

    Comment

    • TheCoder
      DK Veteran
      • Jun 2011
      • 693

      #3
      Wonder if the Judge got to remove his own name from the list first

      Comment

      Working...