Acta:

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gmb45
    Admin Assistant
    • Nov 2008
    • 7538

    #1

    Acta:

    Controversial anti-piracy agreement rejected by EU


    The European Parliament has voted to reject the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (Acta).

    The proposed agreement sought to curb piracy, but internet campaigners said it posed a threat to online freedoms.

    The rejection vote followed a failed attempt to postpone the decision because of ongoing investigations into Acta by the European Court of Justice.

    Euro MP David Martin said: "It's time to give [Acta] its last rites."

    Twenty-two EU member states, including the UK, had signed the Acta treaty - but it had not been formally ratified.

    Outside the EU, the treaty also had the support of the US, Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore and South Korea.

    However, following significant protests, several countries chose not to back it.

    Wednesday's vote is seen by most observers as the final blow to the treaty in its current form.

    It means no member states will be able to join the agreement.

    A total of 478 MEPs voted against the deal, with 39 in favour. There were 165 abstentions.

    'Hello democracy'

    EU Trade Commissioner Karel De Gucht said work on tackling piracy would continue.

    "Today's rejection does not change the fact that the European Commission has committed itself to seeking answers to the questions raised by the European public," he said.

    "The European Commission will continue to seek the legal opinion of the European Court of Justice on whether this agreement harms any of the fundamental rights of European citizens - including freedom of speech.

    "European citizens have raised these concerns and now they have the right to receive answers. We must respect that right."

    As the decision was made, some of those in attendance held banners reading: "Hello democracy, goodbye Acta".

    The UK's Pirate Party had campaigned against Acta since details of the treaty were first made public.

    In a statement, leader Loz Kaye said he was pleased that politicians "listened to the millions" of people who had sent messages in protest.

    "The European Parliament vote is a triumph of democracy over special interests and shady back-room deals," Mr Kaye said.

    "Without this opposition, our representatives would have waved this agreement through.

    It is now clear that it is becoming increasingly politically poisonous to be 'anti-internet'."

    'Significant loss'

    However, key players in the creative industries expressed frustration at the decision.

    "Acta is an important tool for promoting European jobs and intellectual property," said Anne Bergman-Tahon, director of the Federation of European Publishers.

    "Unfortunately the treaty got off on the wrong foot in the parliament, and the real and significant merits of the treaty did not prevail."

    Alan Drewsen, executive director of the International Trademark Association, warned that Europe could now be left behind when it comes to protecting intellectual property.

    "Europe could have seized the chance to support an important treaty that improved intellectual property standards internationally," he said.

    "We expect that Acta will move ahead without the EU, which is a significant loss for the 27 member states."
    ------------------------------------------
    BBC News - Acta: Controversial anti-piracy agreement rejected by EU
    support mountain resue

    support digital-kaos here


    forum rules

    no keygens or torrents to be posted no autodata discussions

    pish pt walkers


  • super jumbe
    V.I.P. Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 11610

    #2
    I doubted it?s not the end they will keep trying till they get anti-piracy agreement..

    If you have done nothing wrong why worry!!!!!




    Tools owned: Hammer, Chisel, Crowbar, Punch, Chainsaw, Cutter and Brain!!!

    Did you know People will question all the good things they hear about you but believe all the bad without a second thought.

    Note:
    All information given is to be used for educational purposes only and should not be taken seriously.

    Comment

    • Shady
      Shite Link King
      • Dec 2010
      • 6404

      #3
      Originally posted by super jumbe
      I doubted it?s not the end they will keep trying till they get anti-piracy agreement..

      If you have done nothing wrong why worry!!!!!




      because actas view of wrong is completely opposite to our view of wrong. no matter what they say, downloading films is victimless. on one hand they say its killing movie making, and on the other films like the avengers are raking in billions.

      Sent from my U8815 using Tapatalk 2
      Fave replies from various threads

      1: What the fff is all that about??? All that crap below your reply I mean, get a life mate
      2: no info on google abt the pace sv5 rang asda they have no idea what i was talking about,
      3: Your total contribution to this forum, bordering on trolling, seems to have been a collection of snipes, one liners & asterisked expletives





      Comment

      • bobwill
        DK Veteran
        • May 2009
        • 525

        #4
        The only country which would have gained is the USA,
        but they can copy any body elses patents they just look at what has been
        patented and then write in they book backdated simlar ideas .

        Comment

        • Meat-Head
          V.I.P. Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 32000

          #5
          *CONFUSED*

          for sale 10 crates of stella

          sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

          Comment

          • johnboy1974
            DK Veteran
            • Dec 2008
            • 3418

            #6
            I thought they already had an anti piracy policy in place with the blocking of the pirate bay in so many countries.

            Comment

            • Canker_Canison
              V.I.P. Member
              • May 2010
              • 3905

              #7
              Originally posted by johnboy1974
              I thought they already had an anti piracy policy in place with the blocking of the pirate bay in so many countries.

              This has nothing to do with anti-piracy.

              Think back to the 60's through to the early 80's. Artists in the music industry got the lions share of the money. At least those big enough to break through to main stream success.

              Clapton, The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Barry White, etc

              Then the number of manufactured bands exploded thanks to people like Pete Waterman. But the record labels took note & joined in.

              The manufactured bands don't get the same royalties as those in the previous eras. They are all salaried, just like any 9-5 worker. But they do longer hours for that little bit more money. But when you break it down, they get paid pretty much the same hourly rate as a factory worker.

              This is what ACTA is there to protect. The big boys at the top. Those that make the money by controlling the artists. It will never help the small artists just starting out.... unless they sign up to a label that then takes over control of what they do...and takes most of the money that's made.

              The internet is a threat to those big companies. People have the power to produce their own music & distribute it cheaply to the masses. Thanks to the MP3 format anyone can release their music cheaply with very little help.

              This is what a big part of what ACTA is designed to stop.
              Canker

              "Animal, vegetable or mineral... I'll do anything, to anything, with anything"
              - The Baby Eating Bishop of Bath & Wells
              [COLOR=Green]

              Comment

              • lagerland
                V.I.P. Member
                • Sep 2010
                • 6031

                #8
                Originally posted by Meat-Head
                *CONFUSED*

                for sale 10 crates of stella

                How much meat................
                I know you believe you understand what you think i said



                >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BUT <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
                I am not sure you realise that what you heard is not what i meant ! sigpic

                Comment

                • Meat-Head
                  V.I.P. Member
                  • Oct 2009
                  • 32000

                  #9
                  Originally posted by lagerland
                  How much meat................
                  How price is depentand on lenth of time of ban from DK for breaking rules.

                  prices are as follows.

                  6 Cans stella or 6 CD's - 3 Min ban that's ?180

                  12 Cans stella or 12 CD's - 2 week ban that's ?1800

                  That's it final offer.

                  Anything else isn't worth it.

                  sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

                  Comment

                  Working...