Outrage as European judges rule life sentences DO breach murderers' human rights

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PremierD
    TAMINATOR
    • Jun 2009
    • 13160

    #16
    Yanks have it correct .. 22 consecutive life sentences + 100 years .. now thats what I call sentencing

    Comment

    • PremierD
      TAMINATOR
      • Jun 2009
      • 13160

      #17
      Darron Bennalford Anderson, of Oklahoma, was found guilty in 1994, of crimes ranging from rape, to kidnapping, larceny, robbery and kidnapping. His initial sentence was two thousand two hundred years.
      Unhappy with the sentence, he chose to appeal the ruling, and when his appeal was decided. However, instead of the result he had hoped for, a reduction in his sentence, he received further sentences, including four thousand years each for sodomy and rape, five hundred years for grand larceny, and one thousand seven hundred and fifty years, and a thousand years respectively for kidnapping and burglary.
      In 1997, he once again appealed this sentence, and this time, had some success. The supreme court of appeals ruled that the larceny conviction was double jeopardy, considering that he had been sentenced already for burglary.
      Currently, Mr. Anderson is eligible for parole in the year twelve thousand, seven hundred and forty four.

      Just found a better one ..

      Comment

      • Meat-Head
        V.I.P. Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 32000

        #18
        On topic

        think that they should be given 10 years in gaol, then write them off, but ebay their giblets & liver / kidneys

        that way when parts sold git service history fir last 10 years and gives them chNce to find another get out cause

        sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

        Comment

        Working...