UK's lowest-paid employees to be classed as 'not working enough'

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kalipo
    DK Veteran
    • Mar 2008
    • 1687

    #1

    UK's lowest-paid employees to be classed as 'not working enough'

    One million people could be pushed to earn more ? or have their benefits cut, says Department for Work and Pensions




    One million of Britain's lowest paid employees will be classed as "not working enough" and could find themselves pushed with the threat of sanctions to find more income under radical changes to benefits, the Department for Work and Pensions has said.

    DWP internal documents seen by the Guardian reveal that people earning between ?330 to around ?1,050 a month ? just under the rate of the national minimum wage for a 35-hour week ? could be mandated to attend job centre meetings where their working habits will be examined as part of the universal credit programme.

    Some of those deemed to be "not working enough" could also be instructed to take on extra training ? and if they fail to complete tasks they could be stripped of their UC benefits in a move which departmental insiders conceded is controversial.

    The DWP said that their overall plans for those in low-paid work were not yet definite and recognised that supporting working families to increase their income was a complex area into which the state hadn't previously intervened. But the department estimates there are one million people in this lower-paid bracket.

    Not all of those will be forced into jobcentres, with individuals with caring responsibilities or other constraints preventing them taking on full-time work highly likely to be excluded.

    The DWP said: "There isn't any real clear, definite plan as to how this [part] would work."

    However the department did confirm that docking social security payments for those who are categorised as "not working enough" formed part of their plans.

    The shadow work and pensions minister, Liam Byrne, said that the policy was attempting to push people into work that wasn't there. "What this out-of-touch government fails to realise is that there simply aren't that many extra shifts to go around. Millions are locked out of work and millions more are desperate to increase their hours."

    The senior ministers involved in heading up welfare reform have spoken about how their flagship reform would completely change the culture of benefits.

    Speaking in parliament during answers to urgent questions on Thursday, Iain Duncan Smith said: "Universal credit isn't just about IT, it is massively about cultural change, to get people back to work and to ensure those who do go to work, particularly the poorest, benefit the most."

    Documents seen by the Guardian show how millions of people currently in receipt of some sort of benefit will be categorised into seven classes including, "too sick to work", "too committed to work", a category including lone parents, and those deemed to be "not working enough".

    UC aims to merges six different benefits with the claimant receiving a single monthly household payment, although earlier this week the National Audit Office warned that the underlying IT project had been beset by "weak management ineffective control and poor governance" and that ?34m of the ?303m spent on technology had already been written off.

    Sources say that new JSA claims will be "shut down" by July 2015 while the tax credits system ? created by Gordon Brown as Labour chancellor ? will end for new claims by November that year. Meanwhile income support for lone parents will be terminated by October 2015. These benefits and others are planned to be folded into to one single universal payment.

    One recent policy document sets out the rationale for placing conditions on those who are in work: "Moving to universal credit will not only remove systemic barriers to employment, it will also remove the distinction between in and out of work, meaning that even one hour of work would profit the claimant ? the decision for the claimant will therefore be simplified ? do they want the additional income from employment, or not?"

    Reflecting the biggest change to social security since 1945, language now being employed at the DWP includes describing the "claimant journey" where getting into work "is just the first step".

    The TUC's general secretary, Frances O'Grady said the DWP's policy would be forcing people from secure and into insecure work: "This unfair move could force people on low-paid jobs to trade relatively secure employment for work of a much more precarious nature, simply to justify a few weeks work on a slightly higher rate of pay.

    "It shows how out of touch the government is with the problems facing low-income families ? who already have more than enough on their plates struggling to make ends meet. They will be living in constant fear of being punished at a time when there are simply not enough decent jobs to go round."

    The DWP said: "This is obviously a complex area where the state has not previously intervened and supported people to increase their earnings. That is why we are working on pilots to get this help right and to determine the most effective support for in-work universal credit claimants.

    "Too many people in low-income work have no support to help them earn more and eventually move to independence."

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...working-enough < Gaston i upgraded
    ich bin stolz ein deutscher zu sein.

    Meathead Lufter Verein - iScheitern

  • rds60h
    DK Veteran
    • Nov 2008
    • 622

    #2
    More shite from government middle and high management who think because they get paid big bucks for sitting around scratching their arses that anyone on a low income must be doing a lot less than them.
    When cuts and belt tightening are required strange how it never happens from the top down, where of course the biggest saving would be made. Instead the top dogs pay their selves more as a reward for cutting jobs and wages at the low end where the real work is done and then punish and criticise the lowly workers for not being able to do their jobs properly (which in some cases now used to be the work load of 4 people) and then demonise those who are not working because those the jobs have gone or are now under paid as being scroungers.

    Comment

    • GastonJ
      V.I.P. Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 5505

      #3
      However the department did confirm that docking social security payments for those who are categorised as "not working enough" formed part of their plans.
      MP's should be due a massive cut then lazy basseds
      My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
      Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
      No good deed goes unpunished....

      Comment

      • gopher7
        DK Veteran
        • Apr 2011
        • 2818

        #4
        How about instead of giving MP's the 32% pay increase they demand, why not make it a 32% pay cut. See how they like that.

        Comment

        • GastonJ
          V.I.P. Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 5505

          #5
          I once had a director who gave a s***ch once about his theory on working more than your contracted hours - "People only work more hours because they feel guilty for not working enough during the day...." Needless to say no-one worked past 5pm ever again and he didn't last long before he was moved along to another job so he could destroy morale in his new job as well.
          My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
          Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
          No good deed goes unpunished....

          Comment

          • bobwill
            DK Veteran
            • May 2009
            • 525

            #6
            Probably not true as it was in the loony left guardian and most of there anti tory news is leftwing sh t stirring with little substance
            In my area that will be manly foreign workers from Portugal and Poland who take all the jobs on farms and chicken factories on minimum wage

            Comment

            • Meat-Head
              V.I.P. Member
              • Oct 2009
              • 32000

              #7
              Originally posted by bobwill
              In my area that will be manly foreign workers from Portugal and Poland who take all the jobs on farms and chicken factories on minimum wage
              then they bring their shitty cars in no speaks da Inglish, and expecta youa to undeiiistant whit theii rrrrr sayhing.

              sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

              Comment

              • gc1966
                DK Veteran
                • Mar 2011
                • 2434

                #8
                Originally posted by Meat-Head
                then they bring their shitty cars in no speaks da Inglish, and expecta youa to undeiiistant whit theii rrrrr sayhing.
                I am English and I struggle to understand you most of the time,would pay good money to see you waxing lyrical with a couple of polish farmworkers who bring their trabant in for m.o.t

                Comment

                • GastonJ
                  V.I.P. Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 5505

                  #9
                  It's probably a push by the Tory party to get back to basics. 40 hour weeks until you're 12 when you leave school and have to do 80 hour weeks instead and get every Christmas morning off with no pay But seriously it will be a way to bring in the end to the working time directive knowing them.
                  My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
                  Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
                  No good deed goes unpunished....

                  Comment

                  Working...