Ex-Formula 1 boss Max Mosley is suing Google for continuing to publish images of him with prostitutes at a sex party.
He has issued High Court proceedings against the internet firm for breaches of the Data Protection Act and misusing private information.
The 74-year-old wants Google to block pictures first published in the now-defunct tabloid News of the World, which he successfully sued in 2008.
Google said it had been working with Mr Mosley "to address his concerns".
Mr Mosley won damages from the News of the World after it published a story alleging he had organised a Nazi-themed ****.
BBC News - Max Mosley sues Google over sex party photos
Just when he hoped it would all have been forgotten he reminds everyone that somewhere on the internet, if people search, are pictures of him and prostitutes.
obviously he wanted the publicity and now those sick enough will be searching again - home goal or what 
What next sue wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Mosley
No, being caught doing stupid thing is dangerous 
He has issued High Court proceedings against the internet firm for breaches of the Data Protection Act and misusing private information.
The 74-year-old wants Google to block pictures first published in the now-defunct tabloid News of the World, which he successfully sued in 2008.
Google said it had been working with Mr Mosley "to address his concerns".
Mr Mosley won damages from the News of the World after it published a story alleging he had organised a Nazi-themed ****.
BBC News - Max Mosley sues Google over sex party photos
Just when he hoped it would all have been forgotten he reminds everyone that somewhere on the internet, if people search, are pictures of him and prostitutes.
obviously he wanted the publicity and now those sick enough will be searching again - home goal or what What next sue wikipedia? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Mosley
At the Leveson Enquiry, Mosley stated his reasons for pursuing Google:
″the fundamental point is that Google could stop this material appearing but they don't, or they won't as a matter of principle. My position is that if the search engines - if somebody were to stop the search engines producing the material, the actual sites don't really matter because without a search engine, nobody will find it, it would just be a few friends of the person who posts it. The really dangerous things are the search engines."[141]
″the fundamental point is that Google could stop this material appearing but they don't, or they won't as a matter of principle. My position is that if the search engines - if somebody were to stop the search engines producing the material, the actual sites don't really matter because without a search engine, nobody will find it, it would just be a few friends of the person who posts it. The really dangerous things are the search engines."[141]
