So in the last 7 years running Scotland what has the SNP achieved by way of negotiating more devolved powers for Scotland, apart from getting this referndum? Isn't the fact that the SNP haven't negotiated anything away from London an indication of a failure on the SNP's part - I'd have thought that devolution of more powers to Scotland to help the people out would have been high on the list of priorities from the minute the SNP formed the goverbment in 2007. Just goes to show how wrong you can be thinking that a government is there to get the best deal for the people of their countrie eh.
However the SNP know best and I'm sure as Scotlands elected MP's they have their own targets to fill their pockets with as much public money as possible and get out asap. MP's do the same in the rest of the UK so that never changes. I have no bias, all MP's are the same. They say what they think you want to hear and tell half truths and then change their minds.
As for businesses coming out this week and saying prices may well go up, well that's a fact of life. What did anyone expect, companies to allow their profits to fall? From what I hear and read teh SNP are up in arms over it. Why don't the people of Scotland deserve to know the whole costs of their vote?
Check on any courier service for the UK, you'll find they charge more for delivery outlying areas - compaies in business to make a profit it's in their nature. The Post Office has a USO for the UK which means letters and the like cost the same to deliver anywhere in the UK, but obviously if Scotland leaves the UK then they won't be part of the USO for the Post Office, that's unless I missed the "USO for the UK, and foreign countries" part, and I'm sure I didn't. This means that delivery costs are very likely to go up for Scotland, and may even come down for the UK since the rest of the UK, where it costs less for the PO to deliver, have been paying a rate that was perhaps higher thus allowing the Post Office to fullfill it's obligations under USO. So what it's only letters, tell that to people living outside of Edinburgh, Perth and Glasgow. If the cost of posting letters goes up then what about the costs to banks, telephone companies, utility companies and the like who send quarterly statements? Well I'm sure they'll find someone to pay for the extra costs that may be charged for delivery in Scotlands outlying areas, after all companies are there to make a profit and the people of Scotland will be the customers to foot the extra cost. Unless of course the Scottish government subsidises that to keep the price low?
Delivery costs for transported goods must surely be higher in those areas which aren't Glasgow, Edinburgh and Perth. I'm not making that up, it's a fact - transportation costs money. Where is the incentive for teh likes of Asda, John Lewis, Tesco etc to keep the price teh same for Scotland when in reality it costs them more to deliver there? One of the thoughts for such companies must be "I can open a new superstore in Narn and have the transportation costs or I can open one in Newcastle" - which do you think they will choose? I think someone is quoted as saying that other reteailers will appear if the likes of Asda don't bother. Great how many companies have the buying power of say Asda to keep prices low? Compare the price of a can of Salmon in Asda to your local corner shop and let me know.
Telecoms companies are about to reveal the costs for Scotland as well, so you may want to keep an eye on that one as well. Remote areas already quite bad for reception may find prices rising. You may also find yourself paying roaming charges south of the border. It'll be alright on the night.
Overall you have to remember only 5 million people, so 1/12 of the market, the other 11/12ths offer the potential for greater volume of sales and cheaper costs for delivery so higher chance of profit, doesn't matter what it is that's being sold.
Institutions such as I've mentioned before DVLA/Immigration Service/HMRC/Bank of England and so on, I hope the SNP has given the full cost of setting all these up? Holyrood was to cost between ?10 and ?40 million, excellent estimate, but totally wrong ?414 million so between 40 and 10 times the estimated cost. Costs for setting of Scotland as being independent are said to be around ?2.7 billion, would you care to multiply that by 40 times for 10 times to get the real value?
However at the end of the day it's Scotlands choice. However had the SNP been interested in the peopel of Scotland don't you think they'd have been negotiating more powers for the government of Scotland to do more for the people of Scotland rather than sitting on their hands as they have been? Odd behaviour and if you were a cynic you'd have to think "For 7 years they've done nothing to try get a better deal for Scotlands people when they were voted in and empowered to do so. The only thing they have achieved is getting a referendum to leave the UK. Now they don't like the truth about the cost. They've done nothing but complain about bullying when all that's being told is the truth. That smacks of a group that have no answers and no plans to produce any either"
Not posting any more
you can all rest at ease 
Yeah I lied, don't the outlying areas gets a subsidy for the cost of fuel? Unsure who pays that but I don't recall it being the Scottish government. The subsidy exists because of the distances when travelling. Apply the same to businesses and you'll see what I mean.
However the SNP know best and I'm sure as Scotlands elected MP's they have their own targets to fill their pockets with as much public money as possible and get out asap. MP's do the same in the rest of the UK so that never changes. I have no bias, all MP's are the same. They say what they think you want to hear and tell half truths and then change their minds.
As for businesses coming out this week and saying prices may well go up, well that's a fact of life. What did anyone expect, companies to allow their profits to fall? From what I hear and read teh SNP are up in arms over it. Why don't the people of Scotland deserve to know the whole costs of their vote?
Check on any courier service for the UK, you'll find they charge more for delivery outlying areas - compaies in business to make a profit it's in their nature. The Post Office has a USO for the UK which means letters and the like cost the same to deliver anywhere in the UK, but obviously if Scotland leaves the UK then they won't be part of the USO for the Post Office, that's unless I missed the "USO for the UK, and foreign countries" part, and I'm sure I didn't. This means that delivery costs are very likely to go up for Scotland, and may even come down for the UK since the rest of the UK, where it costs less for the PO to deliver, have been paying a rate that was perhaps higher thus allowing the Post Office to fullfill it's obligations under USO. So what it's only letters, tell that to people living outside of Edinburgh, Perth and Glasgow. If the cost of posting letters goes up then what about the costs to banks, telephone companies, utility companies and the like who send quarterly statements? Well I'm sure they'll find someone to pay for the extra costs that may be charged for delivery in Scotlands outlying areas, after all companies are there to make a profit and the people of Scotland will be the customers to foot the extra cost. Unless of course the Scottish government subsidises that to keep the price low?
Delivery costs for transported goods must surely be higher in those areas which aren't Glasgow, Edinburgh and Perth. I'm not making that up, it's a fact - transportation costs money. Where is the incentive for teh likes of Asda, John Lewis, Tesco etc to keep the price teh same for Scotland when in reality it costs them more to deliver there? One of the thoughts for such companies must be "I can open a new superstore in Narn and have the transportation costs or I can open one in Newcastle" - which do you think they will choose? I think someone is quoted as saying that other reteailers will appear if the likes of Asda don't bother. Great how many companies have the buying power of say Asda to keep prices low? Compare the price of a can of Salmon in Asda to your local corner shop and let me know.
Telecoms companies are about to reveal the costs for Scotland as well, so you may want to keep an eye on that one as well. Remote areas already quite bad for reception may find prices rising. You may also find yourself paying roaming charges south of the border. It'll be alright on the night.
Overall you have to remember only 5 million people, so 1/12 of the market, the other 11/12ths offer the potential for greater volume of sales and cheaper costs for delivery so higher chance of profit, doesn't matter what it is that's being sold.
Institutions such as I've mentioned before DVLA/Immigration Service/HMRC/Bank of England and so on, I hope the SNP has given the full cost of setting all these up? Holyrood was to cost between ?10 and ?40 million, excellent estimate, but totally wrong ?414 million so between 40 and 10 times the estimated cost. Costs for setting of Scotland as being independent are said to be around ?2.7 billion, would you care to multiply that by 40 times for 10 times to get the real value?
However at the end of the day it's Scotlands choice. However had the SNP been interested in the peopel of Scotland don't you think they'd have been negotiating more powers for the government of Scotland to do more for the people of Scotland rather than sitting on their hands as they have been? Odd behaviour and if you were a cynic you'd have to think "For 7 years they've done nothing to try get a better deal for Scotlands people when they were voted in and empowered to do so. The only thing they have achieved is getting a referendum to leave the UK. Now they don't like the truth about the cost. They've done nothing but complain about bullying when all that's being told is the truth. That smacks of a group that have no answers and no plans to produce any either"
Not posting any more
you can all rest at ease 
Yeah I lied, don't the outlying areas gets a subsidy for the cost of fuel? Unsure who pays that but I don't recall it being the Scottish government. The subsidy exists because of the distances when travelling. Apply the same to businesses and you'll see what I mean.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD



) 
Comment