May had objections to Hinkley Point, says Cable

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Boss
    Complete Pish DK Veteran
    • Jul 2016
    • 171

    #1

    May had objections to Hinkley Point, says Cable

    Theresa May had "objections" to a new nuclear power station at Hinkley Point during the coalition, the then Business Secretary Sir Vince Cable has said.
    Lib Dem Sir Vince said the prime minister had worried about a "gung-ho" approach to Chinese investment in it.
    The government said nuclear energy was important but it would review plans and make a final decision in the autumn.
    French firm EDF, which is financing most of the ?18bn project, says it is "confident" the project would go ahead.
    'Big deal'

    Sir Vince, who was business secretary from 2010-15 and a supporter of Hinkley, said Mrs May, who was home secretary during that period, had been "unhappy" about the government's approach to Chinese investment.
    "Certainly when we were in government Theresa May was, I think, quite clear she was unhappy about the rather gung-ho approach to Chinese investment that we had - and that George Osborne in particular was promoting - and as I recall raised objections to Hinkley at that time," he told BBC's Today programme.



    Responding to the claim, new Business and Energy Secretary Greg Clark said: "The UK needs a reliable and secure energy supply and the government believes that nuclear energy is an important part of the mix.
    "The government will now consider carefully all the component parts of this project and make its decision in the early autumn."
    A Downing Street source said that while there were "all sorts of theories" for the pause, it was "simply that we have a new prime minister and this is a big deal", adding that it was reasonable to "look at the component parts".
    Image copyright Getty Images Image caption Theresa May was 'unhappy about a gung-ho approach to Chinese investment', according to Sir Vince EDF approved funding for Hinkley Point C in Somerset at a board meeting on Thursday and contracts were due to be signed by all the parties involved the following day.
    But in a surprise announcement, Mr Clark issued a brief statement saying ministers would take until the early autumn to review the project.
    In an open letter to staff, EDF boss Vincent de Rivaz said he regretted the uncertainty for employees, the local community and suppliers but understood why the new UK cabinet needed a "little time".
    Sources said China General Nuclear Power Corporation, which is contributing a third of the money, was "bemused" and "frustrated" by the hold-up.
    BBC's Newsnight programme said it was security concerns over Chinese ownership of British nuclear power stations that were the primary reason why Mrs May had postponed the final decision on the deal.
  • super jumbe
    V.I.P. Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 11610

    #2
    She is right we should go solar system!!!
    Tools owned: Hammer, Chisel, Crowbar, Punch, Chainsaw, Cutter and Brain!!!

    Did you know People will question all the good things they hear about you but believe all the bad without a second thought.

    Note:
    All information given is to be used for educational purposes only and should not be taken seriously.

    Comment

    • ifred
      DK Veteran
      • Jun 2010
      • 1627

      #3
      She was right we should produce more methane!
      1st UN-Official Meat-Head Fan Club Member (banned )

      Comment

      • nara
        DK Veteran
        • May 2008
        • 2586

        #4
        Originally posted by super jumbe
        She is right we should go solar system!!!

        You do that SJ. Have you signed up with Richard Branson?
        He who laughs last probably didn't get the joke.

        Comment

        • Meat-Head
          V.I.P. Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 32000

          #5
          Said edf customers extra 10 sodds a year on their bills.

          should it not come down, said first nuvlear plant?
          so what is sellerfield ltd then.?

          sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

          Comment

          • GastonJ
            V.I.P. Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 5505

            #6
            Originally posted by ifred
            She was right we should produce more methane!
            Getting more MP's to talk out of their ar$es as usual then. Shouldn't be too difficult, they do it already.
            My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
            Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
            No good deed goes unpunished....

            Comment

            • GastonJ
              V.I.P. Member
              • Dec 2009
              • 5505

              #7
              Originally posted by Meat-Head
              Said edf customers extra 10 sodds a year on their bills.

              should it not come down, said first nuvlear plant?
              so what is sellerfield ltd then.?
              Well, they are the group responsible for not least reprocessing of nuclear fuel. The word 'reprocessing' has changed over the years so it can get a bit hazy at times, just the way they like it. At one time reprocessing meant extracting the plutonium to make bombs, but that's not very PC any more is it.

              So reprocessing was redefined. Then they were extracting the plutonium for use in MOX reactors. But that isn't popular because basically you are then distributing weapons grade plutonium (can you build spears with it?) around for use in nuclear reactors to those nice peaceful countries to use in their reactors. Yeah right, like that's never backfired before, friendly countries, sell them weapons and they turn round and bite eh. Incidentally China likes building MOX reactors, can't think why (maybe weapons grade plutonium), but there yer go. For those thinking of Donald and what he might do; the US do not reprocess nuclear waste because they are so nice, that and it's illegal to do so there because of various treaties. Not that it ever stopped the US before.

              Now reprocessing means reducing the amount of waste, just not it's radioactivity. Then you chuck it underground in the north, where it's grim anyway, and hope nobody notices especially terrorists; oh and those who get irradiated and contract cancer. After all they chose to live near a nuclear dumping ground, didn't they....

              They do a bit more than that, but the main part is reprocessing and keeping you safe from local and imported material. Improted from France in some cases.
              Last edited by GastonJ; 1 August, 2016, 20:58.
              My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
              Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
              No good deed goes unpunished....

              Comment

              Working...