Children poisoned by modern concentrated washing machine capsules

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gmb45
    Admin Assistant
    • Nov 2008
    • 7538

    #1

    Children poisoned by modern concentrated washing machine capsules

    Dangerous: Parents should be aware of the risk posed to their children by gel washing detergent capsules

    Hundreds of children are being accidentally poisoned by detergent capsules, warn experts.
    Many needed emergency hospital treatment for serious burns to the skin, eyes and throat when they bit or pierced the brightly coloured liquid capsules.
    Concentrated cleaners and detergents under the sink pose a risk to children that many parents are unaware of, according to the Child Accident Prevention Trust.
    It says gel capsules containing concentrated liquid with high levels of chemicals are hazardous to children, but they are rarely sold in child-resistant boxes.
    The trust said there was an 11 per cent rise last year in calls for advice from health professionals about children being accidentally poisoned.
    About 100 children under 14 are admitted to hospital each year because of poisoning by soaps and deodorants.
    Last year, almost 200 inquiries were made about incidents involving Bold 2 in 1 and Ariel Liquitabs.
    European safety information from manufacturer Procter & Gamble, which makes both products, says exposure to liquitabs may cause eye irritation, while prolonged exposure can irritate skin and ingesting the product may trigger vomiting.
    Trust chief executive Katrina Phillips said concentrated products were popular because they cut costs for manufacturers, retailers and customers.
    But the sight, smell and the tactile nature of the laundry detergent capsules made them attractive to children.
    She said: 'We're worried because inquisitive toddlers can get into the boxes relatively easily and do find the capsules attractive. If toddlers then bite into the capsules, the concentrated chemicals can be harmful.'

    support mountain resue

    support digital-kaos here


    forum rules

    no keygens or torrents to be posted no autodata discussions

    pish pt walkers


  • chroma
    V.I.P. Member
    • Feb 2009
    • 1976

    #2
    and a few years ago the argument was made that products looked simmilar so kids didnt know which is which and ate those too...

    Its kinda sidestepping the argument that your kids shouldnt be under the kitchen sink and in a position to eat anything in there to begin with!

    Its what? a few quid for a lock and 30 min job to fit? or even less time to slap your kids upside the head for being in amongst stuff that could kill them to begin with?

    I can remember getting slapped rotten for being in under the kitchen sink exploring as a kid (my mom had these wodden SKOAL things that hurt like you wouldnt believe) it stopped me going back there in no uncertain terms and im still alive!

    As for the seriously dangerous stuff? that was all firmly locked away in my dads cupboard and drawer.

    Trust parents today to blame manufacturers for allowing their kids to be in a position to ingest poison.
    He who laughs last thinks slowest.

    Comment

    • dik
      DK Veteran
      • Apr 2009
      • 955

      #3
      My dad used to hide his 12 bore in a top kitchen cupboard, we had to make sure he never caught us playing with it!
      sigpic another happy customer

      Sent from my keyboard using fingers to type

      Comment

      • ruudvandan
        DK Veteran
        • Dec 2008
        • 1091

        #4
        it's always made me wonder why people keep all this stuff under the kitchen sink. If you have dangerous stuff keep it out of reach of kids or lock it away. You can't blame manufacturers for a customer's lack of common sense
        http://www.facebook.com/BoycottFIFASponsors

        Comment

        Working...