Rohingya refugees in humanitarian crisis.

[super jumbe]

Rohingya refugees overtake 2016 Mediterranean migrant numbers in ‘unprecedented’ humanitarian crisis.



The mass exodus of Rohingya Muslims fleeing Burma in just under three weeks is now triple the number of refugees who have tried to enter Europe across the Mediterranean so far this year, leaving aid agencies overwhelmed by the crisis.

An estimated 370,000 have escaped from Burma’s northern Rakhine state to overcrowded Bangladeshi refugee camps since August 25, compared to 128,012 people seeking to cross the Mediterranean since January.

Burma’s government has admitted that 176 out of 471 ethnic Rohingya villages are now empty.

Antonio Guterres, UN secretary-general,on Wednesday called on authorities in Burma to end the violence against the Rohingya and acknowledged the situation there is best described as ethnic cleansing.

The humanitarian situation in Burma was "catastrophic," Mr Guterres said, and called on all countries to do what they could to supply aid.

The Burmese government said on Wednesday its leader, Aung San Suu Kyi, will skip next week's UN General Assembly meetings, and give a domestic speech to address the crisis, amid growing international outrage at her refusal to condemn the killings.

Rohingyas have said their homes were set on fire and family members shot, slashed or burned to death. “This is the fastest growing refugee crisis in the past five years, with serious human rights concerns,” a UNHCR spokesperson told the Telegraph.

Roland Oliphant: The scale of the Rohingya crisis 'is mindblowing'

Children 'burned alive' say Rohingya refugees.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...grant-numbers/

[Meat-Head]

Ok so what has happened with the French ground zero jungle camp?

maca what did you say about sharks?

[super jumbe]

The Rohingya trace their origins in the region as far as the fifteenth century,
The government refuses to grant the Rohingya citizenship, and as a result the vast majority of the group’s members have no legal documentation, effectively making them stateless. Myanmar’s 1948 citizenship law was already exclusionary, and the military junta, which seized power in 1962, introduced a law twenty years later stripping the Rohingya of access to full citizenship.

British rule in Burma, also known as British Burma, lasted from 1824 to 1948, from the Anglo-Burmese wars through the creation of Burma as a Province of British India to the establishment of an independently administered colony, and finally independence, the Rohingya people should be British citizen because they were ruled by British colonial times and all should be allowed to come to UK freely.

[Meat-Head]

Fithteenth centursry, great they wiuld have enough money saved to go to emerica or oztraila then, bigger island than here

[ifred]

Any more displace people want to move somewhere else planet will tip over and we'll all fall off especial if its flat

[GastonJ]

the Rohingya people should be British citizen because they were ruled by British colonial times and all should be allowed to come to UK freely.

So with your logic we should also allow in all of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, all of the US, all of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, great chunks of France, China, Sri Lanka, masses of people from most of the middle east, and loads of people form most countries in Africa then? You won't ever join the Conservative, UKIP or BNP parties with your outlook on such matters.

[super jumbe]

So with your logic we should also allow in all of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, all of the US, all of Australia, New Zealand, Canada, great chunks of France, China, Sri Lanka, masses of people from most of the middle east, and loads of people form most countries in Africa then? You won't ever join the Conservative, UKIP or BNP parties with your outlook on such matters.

Not every persons you mention only if there life is in danger, look this for example British Indians and Asians from Uganda “one of the most successful groups of immigrants anywhere” When Idi Amin expelled Indians from Uganda in 1972, most of them moved to Britain, settled in UK This strand of migration for example when the citizens are in danger of starvation and killed, the colonial countries have to help, similar the migration from Syria in 2015/2016/2017 most citizens were allowed to settle in Europe and UK why not Rohingya they are humans, I am getting tired when people have been prisons for animal cruelty so were are the humans rights and the UN?

[ifred]

Not every persons you mention only if there life is in danger, look this for example British Indians and Asians from Uganda “one of the most successful groups of immigrants anywhere” When Idi Amin expelled Indians from Uganda in 1972, most of them moved to Britain, settled in UK This strand of migration for example when the citizens are in danger of starvation and killed, the colonial countries have to help, similar the migration from Syria in 2015/2016/2017 most citizens were allowed to settle in Europe and UK why not Rohingya they are humans, I am getting tired when people have been prisons for animal cruelty so were are the humans rights and the UN?

So I take it your a vegan then SJ If not probably your lunch is going to be rather pished with you!

[nara]

...the Rohingya people should be British citizen because they were ruled by British colonial times and all should be allowed to come to UK freely.

Is that genuine b*llocks, or does the smiley mean that you just think it's b*llocks?

[super jumbe]

Oh my god nara nara nara..
Off topic….you need to be educated were life matters, suppose for example in UK we had a massive earth quake fire everywhere inhabitable to stay on land and all the countries says bullocks that’s ok with you!!! Thanks.