Global data storage calculated at 295 exabytes

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gmb45
    Admin Assistant
    • Nov 2008
    • 7538

    #1

    Global data storage calculated at 295 exabytes

    ~~~~ me 295bn gb, thats 294 bn gb of ~~~~ films


    The world's data would be the equivalent of 3 layers of books over China

    Mankind's capacity to store the colossal amount of information in the world has been measured by scientists.

    The study, published in the journal Science, calculates the amount of data stored in the world by 2007 as 295 exabytes.

    That is the equivalent of 1.2 billion average hard drives.

    The researchers calculated the figure by estimating the amount of data held on 60 technologies from PCs and and DVDs to paper adverts and books.

    "If we were to take all that information and store it in books, we could cover the entire area of the US or China in 3 layers of books," Dr Martin Hilbert of the University of Southern California told the BBC's Science in Action.
    By 2007, 94% of stored information was kept digitally

    Computer storage has traditionally been measured in kilobytes, then megabytes, and now usually gigabytes.

    After that comes terabytes, petabytes, then exabytes. One exabyte is a billion gigabytes.

    The same information stored digitally on CDs would create a stack of discs that would reach beyond the moon, according to the researchers.

    Scientists calculated the figure by estimating the amount of data held on 60 analogue and digital technologies during the period from 1986 to 2007.

    They considered everything from computer hard drives to obsolete floppy discs, and x-ray films to microchips on credit cards.

    The survey covers a period known as the "information revolution" as human societies transition to a digital age.

    It shows that in 2000 75% of stored information was in an analogue format such as video cassettes, but that by 2007, 94% of it was digital.

    "There have been other revolutions before." Dr Hilbert told the BBC's Science in Action programme.

    "The car changed society completely, or electricity.

    Every 40, 50 or 60 years something grows faster than anything else, and right now it's information.

    "Basically what you can do with information is transmit it through space, and we call that communication.

    You can transmit it through time; we call that storage.

    Or you can transform it, manipulate it, change the meaning of it, and we call that computation."

    Other results from the global survey show that we broadcast around two zettabytes of data (a zettabyte is 1000 exabytes).

    That's the equivalent of 175 newspapers per person, per day.

    The fastest growing area of information manipulation has been computation.

    During the two decades the survey covers, global computing capacity increased by 58% per year.

    These numbers may sound large, but they are still dwarfed by the information processing and storage capacity of nature.

    "The Human DNA in one single body can store around 300 times more information than we store in all our technological devices" according to Dr Hilbert.

    This study looked at the world as a whole, but the scientists say that it does show that the "digital divide" between rich and poor countries is growing.

    Despite the spread of computers and mobile phones, the capacity to process information is becoming more unequal.

    In 2002 people in the developed world could communicate eight times more information than people in the developing world. Just five years later, in 2007, that gap has nearly doubled, and people in richer countries have 15 times more information carrying capacity.

    The study also pinpoints the arrival of the digital age as 2002, the first year worldwide digital storage capacity overtook analogue capacity
    -------------------------------------------------------------------
    BBC News - Global data storage calculated at 295 exabytes
    support mountain resue

    support digital-kaos here


    forum rules

    no keygens or torrents to be posted no autodata discussions

    pish pt walkers


  • Grizz
    DK Veteran
    • Sep 2010
    • 1598

    #2
    trying to think of teh size of an exabyte has jsut fried one of my resistors....... ssssssssssssst

    Comment

    • chroma
      V.I.P. Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 1976

      #3
      In Bits:

      1 = 1 Bit
      8 = 1 Byte
      1024 = 1 Kilobyte
      1,048,576 = 1 Megabyte
      1,073,741,824 = 1 Gigabyte
      1,099,511,627,776 = 1 Terabyte
      1,125,899,906,842,624 = 1 Petabyte
      1,152,921,504,606,846,976 = 1 Exabyte
      1,180,591,620,717,411,303,424 = 1 Zetabyte
      1,208,925,819,614,629,174,706,176 = 1 Yottabyte
      1,237,940,039,285,380,274,899,124,224 = No agreed upon term

      In realistic terms a silicon transistor is roughly 22microns (42 atoms) for an exabyte you would need a single chip 12.6 MILLION KM? (12,682,136,550) to store it on a single computer!
      He who laughs last thinks slowest.

      Comment

      • Meat-Head
        V.I.P. Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 32000

        #4
        Originally posted by chroma
        exabyte you would need a single chip 12.6 MILLION KM? (12,682,136,550) to store it on a single computer!
        not going to argue, but word on street says the world is ONLY 346 million square miles - whatever that is in KM!

        sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

        Comment

        • chroma
          V.I.P. Member
          • Feb 2009
          • 1976

          #5
          Originally posted by Meat-Head
          not going to argue, but word on street says the world is ONLY 346 million square miles - whatever that is in KM!
          553.6million M? (1.6km = 1mile)

          Its a variable scale, depends on the silicon fabrication.
          Word is they've developed a way to get a transistor out of 7atoms instead of 42. substituting silicon for phosphor which is slightly larger but still runs in at only 4microns across or thereabouts, so the number will shrink again... as soon as they figure out how to eliminate crosstalk and voltage bleeds.

          The size would still be too big for practical applications, even if you cubed the thing...
          He who laughs last thinks slowest.

          Comment

          • crernesto
            Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 50

            #6
            good information

            Comment

            Working...