David Templeton

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • skegsagypsy
    DK Veteran
    • Aug 2009
    • 1230

    #1

    David Templeton

    I am reliably informed that Temps has tripled his wages by going to sevco in div3 sfl, how can this be possible, surely an SPL club should be paying much better than a div3 club. Can't blame the lad even though I believe it to be a retrograde step at a vital stage in his football career, obviously ?? is more important than ambition, good luck to him but a poor move imho.
    'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.'
    -Bishop Desmond Tutu
  • southpaw83
    DK Veteran
    • Sep 2008
    • 360

    #2
    I think players are being told they will be back in the SPL next season. Which makes you wonder why they are saying that

    Comment

    • cgscott
      V.I.P. Member
      • Jul 2008
      • 3513

      #3
      Not next season. 3 years. Also what does it matter how his wages are paid. As long as its above board. Whats to say im not a millionaire and have donated Rangers the money to cover his wages.

      All that matters is that the deal is done. 4 years. He obviously has faith in playing for what is going to be in a short space of time one of the biggest clubs in scotland again.

      Thanks for keeping us rangers fans up to date on our affairs again.

      Mucho Gracis.

      Last edited by cgscott; 1 September, 2012, 20:23.
      sigpic


      Patience is a virtue.

      Comment

      • skegsagypsy
        DK Veteran
        • Aug 2009
        • 1230

        #4
        Originally posted by cgscott
        Not next season. 3 years.
        Not if sevco don't win away

        Originally posted by cgscott
        Also what does it matter how his wages are paid. As long as its above board.
        Thats the question though, is it all above board ?

        Originally posted by cgscott
        Whats to say im not a millionaire and have donated Rangers the money to cover his wages.
        Your NOT though!

        Originally posted by cgscott
        All that matters is that the deal is done. 4 years. He obviously has faith in playing for what is going to be in a short space of time one of the biggest clubs in scotland again.
        Either that or he's just a greedy f?ker with no ambition, and has made a complete shoite of what could have been a very good career.

        Originally posted by cgscott
        Thanks for keeping us rangers fans up to date on our affairs again.

        Mucho Gracis.
        The post was directly about D Templeton indirectly about sevco but your welcome to join in
        'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.'
        -Bishop Desmond Tutu

        Comment

        • cgscott
          V.I.P. Member
          • Jul 2008
          • 3513

          #5
          Who cares. Stop moochin about the past. Any other transfers you want to talk about?
          sigpic


          Patience is a virtue.

          Comment

          • skegsagypsy
            DK Veteran
            • Aug 2009
            • 1230

            #6
            Originally posted by cgscott
            Who cares. Stop moochin about the past. Any other transfers you want to talk about?

            'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.'
            -Bishop Desmond Tutu

            Comment

            • johnboy1974
              DK Veteran
              • Dec 2008
              • 3418

              #7
              Can't blame a man for following the money- every player does it.

              Comment

              • skegsagypsy
                DK Veteran
                • Aug 2009
                • 1230

                #8
                Originally posted by johnboy1974
                Can't blame a man for following the money- every player does it.
                I did point that out in my original post.
                'If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor. If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.'
                -Bishop Desmond Tutu

                Comment

                • cgscott
                  V.I.P. Member
                  • Jul 2008
                  • 3513

                  #9
                  sigpic


                  Patience is a virtue.

                  Comment

                  • colin mckenzie
                    Top Poster
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 172

                    #10
                    surely they should be forced to pay the jelavic transfer off first? just saying

                    Comment

                    • johnboy1974
                      DK Veteran
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 3418

                      #11
                      Originally posted by colin mckenzie
                      surely they should be forced to pay the jelavic transfer off first? just saying
                      Isnt that piece of business to do with the old club and not the new rangers.

                      Comment

                      • colin mckenzie
                        Top Poster
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 172

                        #12
                        Originally posted by johnboy1974
                        Isnt that piece of business to do with the old club and not the new rangers.
                        the new club had to pay the debt to other scottish clubs for the old club debt? why not european teams? its either the right thing to do or isnt?

                        also how can the new club claim to have 54 league titles? but then say we dont pay the transfers the old club still owe? im at a loss to understand it but to surmise am i right when i say the solution rangers have is they lost all the bad things and negatives of the old club but kept the stuff they wanted? badge/history etc..? serious question have i got that right?

                        Comment

                        • johnboy1974
                          DK Veteran
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 3418

                          #13
                          Originally posted by colin mckenzie
                          the new club had to pay the debt to other scottish clubs for the old club debt? why not european teams? its either the right thing to do or isnt?

                          also how can the new club claim to have 54 league titles? but then say we dont pay the transfers the old club still owe? im at a loss to understand it but to surmise am i right when i say the solution rangers have is they lost all the bad things and negatives of the old club but kept the stuff they wanted? badge/history etc..? serious question have i got that right?
                          Colin in there really any point to going over all this again, I think not.

                          Comment

                          • rds60h
                            DK Veteran
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 622

                            #14
                            All the bitching is starting again !
                            The fact is Rangers (not newco or oldco or any other old cobblers) are in the SFL Div 3.
                            They have sold over 40,000 season tickets, more than any other Scottish club and are therefore able to use this income to fund the transfer fees and wages for new players.
                            The new players and those that stayed with Rangers are attracted to the future potential and the past history of the club (the history is there because Rangers are not a "new" club they are under "new" ownership - this is a situation that has also been the case with most if not all Scottish clubs and that change of ownership is also part of the history).
                            These players also see the opportunity to play in front of large crowds and large TV audiences on a regular basis, so where is the backward step in their ambition ?
                            The only opportunity that they are missing out on is that of playing in Europe in the immediate future and that opportunity would not have been there even if Rangers had been kept in the SPL.

                            Comment

                            • colin mckenzie
                              Top Poster
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 172

                              #15
                              guys i think i made valid points, you seem to accept the fact rangers have lets be honest got off lightly as i would if it were celtic no doubt id be adopting the same nothing to see here attitude and rangers fans would be looking for justice to be done. simple really..

                              Comment

                              Working...