Manchester United's FFP stance a bit rich

[andy1967]

https://twitter.com/StuBrennanMEN

Stuart Brennan

@StuBrennanMEN

Manchester City reporter at the Manchester Evening News
Manchester ? http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk

Says he is a Citeh reporter.

[tshirtman]

Re: Manchester United's FFP stance a bit rich

yes you're right Brennan does report on city, but he's still a yoonited fan.

He used to report on United until the glazers took over, then he started to promote FC United, as a result your beloved leader, old wino bacon face, refused to do any interviews with him (sound familiar) so he got moved to reporting on city & FC United.

He's one of the few decent journos.

[leotheloin]

being a united fan, I would have thought you'd have known Stuart Brennan is the chief sports writer for the Manchester Evening News,

but then again you'd have to live in Manchester to buy the M.E.N, which most United fans don't

and yes, he is a red.

Got 3 tickets united v rm heading over sunday evening and on monday and tuesday i will buy a copy ot the MEN

[thered]

but then again you'd have to live in Manchester to buy the M.E.N, which most United fans dont

with 656 million supporters apparantly they may struggle to fit

[tshirtman]

with 656 million supporters apparantly they may struggle to fit

so you're trying to claim that 1 in 10 people
of the worlds population are United fans

ye right!!

[andy1967]

Got 3 tickets united v rm heading over sunday evening and on monday and tuesday i will buy a copy ot the MEN

Just read it online m8

[DLINKLA]

citys financial loss has halved this season,.uniteds loss continues to rise

This comment is way off the mark. United don't make any losses. I think you may mean the interest payments .

These payments are being met and the overall debt is coming down also the clubs cash reserves are fine with approx ?80 million sat in the bank.


Weather yoi agree with this whole article is dependent on if your club has a large investor

Ask this same question to Man City a number of years ago an they would have wanted the restrictions now they have a large investor means they are against it.

Every club will have their self interests and agenda.

[tshirtman]

This comment is way off the mark. United don't make any losses. I think you may mean the interest payments .

These payments are being met and the overall debt is coming down also the clubs cash reserves are fine with approx ?80 million sat in the bank.


Weather yoi agree with this whole article is dependent on if your club has a large investor

Ask this same question to Man City a number of years ago an they would have wanted the restrictions now they have a large investor means they are against it.

Every club will have their self interests and agenda.

But it's going to hit the smaller clubs even more,
how many clubs are selling clubs and rely on income from sales of players, this is going to hinder there revenue.

City are about to sign another sponsorship deal with a power supplier, to promote green energy with there new training facility and academy,
and according to the press this sponsorship deal is even more lucrative than Chelsea Gasprom deal. plus they have a new Nike deal, like I've said before FFP wont effect city.

and we all know the prem FFP is a fit up, instigated by United, otherwise it would have been based on club debt not profits.