Mark hughes too go....

[lfc4life]

From HOT-TOTTI, Rome, via text on 999 : "The headline in Gazzetta dello Sport is: "City, addio a Hughes? Mancini in pole position". No need to translate, I think." <<< this came from bbc sport.

and here from sky sports website -

Sky Sports | Football | Premier League | News | Hughes to learn City fate

[opsmonkey]

i hope you asked that person to post their mobile number..??

[lfc4life]

oops that the 606 number on bbc website and

1831: BREAKING NEWS: Manchester City have confirmed the sacking of manager Mark Hughes, and announced the appointment of Roberto Mancini as his replacement.

[smirnoff_rules]

l dont think Mark Hughes could believe his luck when it was bought out and the team because better than him tho

[opsmonkey]

oops that the 606 number on bbc website

ok them, i'm the cock

Looks like their owners want a better future for their club.. ours is happy to plod on with shite

[lfc4life]

still tho all that money and there couldn't get any top tier players

And wonder why rafa couldnt be sacked so quick

[bigfella]

Hughes gone ................suppose it s nag 3 s fault

[ruudvandan]

City's 19th Manager in the reign of Sir Alex, how long will tthis one last?

[lfc4life]

theres an online poll on the mark hughes story of his sacking ..... 80 percent have voted it was unfair too sack him

[ruudvandan]

Yeah well, City have got their Mankini now -- perverts!

[dctyper]

unfair, he wasnt the right man for the job from the start. he acted like he had won everything already

[TopGun]

Too be fair, He never had time to work with all the players and get them working together as a team.

But on the other side you have a manager who has been playing fantasy football in the transfer market and Sven at the same point in the season had 4 points more without all the world class players.

Title challege was the only way he would have kept his job.

[shellbob]

He would have brought them success because he gave 100% as a player and a manager

[ruudvandan]

Too be fair, He never had time to work with all the players and get them working together as a team.

But on the other side you have a manager who has been playing fantasy football in the transfer market and Sven at the same point in the season had 4 points more without all the world class players.

Title challege was the only way he would have kept his job.

who are all these World Class players who Sparky signed then? He could only sign players who United and Chelsea didn't want.

[HoTTDubbER]

Huges was never right man 4 city he was lucky he lasted as long as he did tbh , the bottom line is he doesnt have the experience in 1 tactics , his defence had more holes than a cheese grater
and no2 it take a very experienced manager to keep in check the kinds of players and personality's that city want to bring in, the only way to deal with these kind of players and get them playing for you is for them to have respect and look upto the manager , Huges will 1 day be a great manager but he needs more experience
if a club wants a top 4 finish and spending the money they are ,they really havn't got time 4 a new manager 2 gain experience they want results trophies and wins now ,
im not saying i agree with way city did it . i mean lets be honest it could have waited untill Monday
but they did it now and not after Christmas for 1 reason and that's to attract players in jan window from overseas

Huges got given more time then Chelsea waited be4 replacing manager when abroamovich came in not 2 menchion other managers
its a ruthless game and Huges had more than a chance he wouldn't have lasted 2 months in a top 4 club like Chelsea

The owners gave him 250 mil and Huge's gave them the longest string of draws in prem

make a point if u disagree , but that's the way i see