Is this evidence of time travel???
Collapse
X
-
this vid again
. its already been proven its an iphone 4 they sent it back in time hopin people in 1928 couldn't jailbreak it but geohots great great grandad is charlie chaplin and he did it straight after the premiere with the 3G signal he pumps out of his walkin stick
Comment
-
Michael J. Fox was born on June 9, 1961
I have an exclusive picture of him dated back to 1885 :

100% proof of time travel existence...Comment
-
i dont understand that when you watch this clip! The woman seems to go transparent?!Is this evidence of time travel???
Tis is a clip from a Charlie Chaplin film premiere in Los Angeles in 1928
Watch the person who comes into shot second in the second scene behind the rather unconvincing zebra - if this was filmed today you would say (s)he was using a mobile phone!
YouTube - Charlie Chaplin's time traveler
IM SORRY but i will never have any sympathy for maggie thatcher .... the bitch
I WOULD STILL LIKE TO SAY MY HEART AND RESPECT GOES OUT ALL BRITISH AND ALL ARMY TROOPS FIGHTING THE TERROR WHICH STILL BREEDS IN THE WORLD!! YOU HAVE AND ALWAYS WILL HAVE MY UTMOST RESPECT !
YNWA!!!
JUSTICE FOR THE '96"
"People say football is a matter of life and death. I'm disappointed by that approach, I believe it is much more important than that - Bill Shankly" -
YNWAComment
-
Comment
-
If you've got the technology to time travel you will have the technology to adjust for movement of the Earth in space. Simples!
It'd be difficult to prove one way or another anyway because you'd have to be there at the begining and the end with other witnesses.
I for one don't care when WW3 starts I'm going back to 2063 anyway
Comment
-
Comment
-
They say you can only travel forward so that you don't go back in time with Lottery winning numbers
Comment
-
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KR8byz5DCXk]YouTube - The Deconstructor - S01E03: Time Travel (1 of 2)[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcfcSSOliMA]YouTube - The Deconstructor - S01E03: Time Travel (2 of 2)[/ame]Comment
-
-
The sound barrier was more a problem of friction coefficients, shear and torsional forces and material strength problems.
The faster you go through the air the greater the forces of air friction become and that translates directly onto wingspan problems, the ability to control drag (without it aircraft fall out the sky, cant turn, etc) and directly impacts the forces put onto the body of the aircraft.
Supersonic travel was a problem not due to the speed (jet engines are fairly easy to manufacture, far simpler than internal combustions) it was down to aircraft breaking up under the forces or wings refusing to function normally to control drag.
Superluminal on the other hand is a LOT more problematic, as you approach the speed of light your mass gets bigger, at the speed of light it becomes infinite. In order to move an infinite mass you need infinite energy. So conventional rocket going past the speed of light or even getting remotely close becomes absurd. This applies in Special Relativity.
General Relativity is essentially just Special with gravity added to it, using that you can theoretically travel massive distances quicker than light could get there, but you still cant breech the speed of light in a vacuum.
This sounds odd until you understand that your not travelling faster than light your just introducing a shortcut, like two people approaching a house, one using the path and the other jumping over the garden fence.
Its all to do with folding 4d space-time by using super massive gravity, it works well on paper, but you need negative energy to stop the gravity from collapsing in on itself. There's nothing discovered as yet that would supply negative energy.
So yeah its all a pipe dream.
Supersonic travel was more a material and force problem that was fairly simple to overcome, the physics always agreed it was possible.
Superluminal travel has always been a problem regarding the physics and maths, never down to materials or designs.He who laughs last thinks slowest.Comment





Comment