If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Fair enough, but the current models seem to be reasonably supported.
I wouldn't buy either personally (purely because they're closed source), but if i was in the market for a closed source box i would certainly consider the Ferguson over open/sky boxes, mainly because of the added extras like YT and has a web interface etc.
But we all have different needs/want's from boxes.
The original 102 has been around a couple of years and thats what i based my answer on, Sadly lacklustre in the support side of things
I set one up for a mate of mine he's very happy with it cccam very stable sofar and the support is better then the technomate boxes plus the price is nice for what it can do.
Nice budget box.
I heard if you go for the wifi models that the drivers for the wifi dongle's aren't great and loose connection a lot.
Everything discussed on this forum is for experimental and educational purposes only. Use the information at your own risk.
I set one up for a mate of mine he's very happy with it cccam very stable sofar and the support is better then the technomate boxes plus the price is nice for what it can do.
Nice budget box.
I heard if you go for the wifi models that the drivers for the wifi dongle's aren't great and loose connection a lot.
I would not go so far to say it has better support than the Technomates, the term i used was lacklustre as in minimal.
Comment