branson vs murdoch

[00360362878]

Just a thought on the massive investment Branson has just gone through to stop the cable feed abuse.

Which way will the many go ? cable or sat, (everybody has to pay now)

The ones who was paying nothing, he won't care.
The ones that was at least paying for other services, now that's a different matter.

I think there will be a big shift in Murdoch's favour, it's just a better option.

wonder if we will get to find out who wins.

[kakawak]

personally i think sly will always win, they are the monopoly of tv and i would love to see every sly customer have the balls to cancel sly and watch mr murdochs shares go right down the pan along with sly.

if i am correct on saying....why would you want to pay vermin ?63 a month for top tier when jo blogs can get it cheaper with sly. the only thing thats worth having from vermin is there BB service nothing more!

as much as i hate to say it - sly will win in the end....thats a no brainer!

[opsmonkey]

I've got both.. Virgin BB & Phone (Package is cheaper than BT / Sky option) with full Sky HD..

Full Sky HD = ?25 a month for 12 months
VM BB & Phone = ?27 a month..

[khenryashley]

I have to agree with opsmonkey.
There are lots of positives for VM.
Better broadband.
Cheaper bundles especially if you have additional boxes and HD.
VM offer discounts and loyalty reductions.
No picture loss as soon as it rains heavily or snows.
You pays your money and you take your choice.

[kakawak]

[QUOTE=opsmonkey;744961]I've got both.. Virgin BB & Phone (Package is cheaper than BT / Sky option) with full Sky HD..QUOTE]

yes it might be cheaper on what you get but overall its not cheaper on what other 3rd part's offer as for sly tv cant argue with