SexView Poor quailty ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mickz
    Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 48

    #1

    SexView Poor quailty ?

    Hi,
    Has anybody else noticed how much SV Has lost its quailty Eg Blocking picture - Over the last couple of weeks it seems to be getting worse.All other channels are fine.
    Feedback welcome before i start messing with LNB etc.
    UK , Leeds
    DM 800 With NB V9
  • scoot1690
    Banned
    • Jul 2009
    • 90

    #2
    agree with you 100% its like something taken from a mobile phone the pixels are awful

    Comment

    • opsmonkey
      V.I.P. Member
      • Nov 2008
      • 5379

      #3
      seems to be ok on mine.. the quality has always been poor though.. its not exceptionally pixelated on mine, no more than normal for the past few years..

      Which channels in particular or is it the same for all on yours..??

      I find the S1, S2 etc just as bad regarding quality

      Comment

      • on_the_jazz
        DK Veteran
        • Jul 2008
        • 557

        #4
        Are you guys sure it isn't your eyes? Those channels will do that to ya.

        Comment

        • flyingpig
          DK Veteran
          • Aug 2009
          • 930

          #5
          I have to agree,,, I checked them (research only...) and they where extremely pixalated, with camera movement pixalation was awfull.......

          Comment

          • opsmonkey
            V.I.P. Member
            • Nov 2008
            • 5379

            #6
            its exceptionally poor tonight.. the adverts between movies are fine though which is strange

            Comment

            • tvadict
              DK Veteran
              • Jul 2009
              • 363

              #7
              If you switch between private spice and Sex view you will notice a huge huge difference.

              Sex view is crap,

              I head they are going HD in january

              Comment

              • calisto
                Junior Member
                • May 2008
                • 37

                #8
                Yep, bad here as well, thought it was poor signal strenth but that is between 90-91%
                sigpic

                Comment

                Working...