If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I suppose it depends what you compare the picture quality with and the quality of your TV.
In my case, I have a Dreambox 500S and a Sky HD receiver and I would say in terms of picture quality it's superior to both receivers on my Samsung C530. I'm really happy with it in terms of picture quality.
Blind scan is improved with the newer patches, you can select frequency range (obviously) just V or H or both, also TV only or just FTA, and you can select to scan in increments from 1 to 32 MHz. The receiver also auto navigates if you want. Best to leave this running when you're out for the day! In my case it pulls in over 7300 channels from 31 sats, and rarely misses a transponder.
Thank you so much!. So it looks like they changed from the classic blindscan menu, with the addition of the Mhz steps. So now the TM 5402 is 100% identical to the Blade Media. Now I need to decide which one is the best choice for me. I am thinking the blind scan on the TM might be more accurate . I think it's a win win situation if I go either way
Comment