Dictionary

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • patkins
    V.I.P. Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 3662

    #1

    Dictionary

    Hows about a dictionary of terms used in the technical forums, I`m new to DK and am trying to get info on cams(i have a T Rex twin module powered by firecrypt which gave me Premiere on 19`E and Inow get an occasional Betacrypt chan. free on 9`E) otherwise I might as well be looking into a shore. Can the above cam be formatted through the debug on the humax hd2000ci menu. I find a lot of the terms used in the forums too technical. Any comment?
  • bvilleuk
    DK Veteran
    • Aug 2009
    • 625

    #2
    Originally posted by pat kinsella
    Hows about a dictionary of terms used in the technical forums, I`m new to DK and am trying to get info on cams(i have a T Rex twin module powered by firecrypt which gave me Premiere on 19`E and Inow get an occasional Betacrypt chan. free on 9`E) otherwise I might as well be looking into a shore. Can the above cam be formatted through the debug on the humax hd2000ci menu. I find a lot of the terms used in the forums too technical. Any comment?

    Easy Peasy!! You will find this will always happen if the antenna has not been
    discombobulated, which to put in simple terms (because I am a simple person)
    means the coaxial coefficient resistance does not match the downloaded
    compacitance when the current is in fluctuation mode, If on the other hand your
    Coat Hanger is of the coated kind you will get a much improved reception
    provided the ohms is not higher than the htz (if that were the case you would be
    making toast). You can of course fine tune the static, with a variable static
    tuner, once you have tuned out the white noise (no racial slur intended), you
    are left with a smooth sinewave, with a little glass paper you can produce a
    rough sinewave which you demodulate to your herts (get it!) content, no will
    understand you, but they never do anyway.

    Hope this helps Pat -- now where did I put my pink tablets........

    .
    .
    WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
    .
    CAPITAL !!
    .
    BRING IT BACK...............
    .
    .

    Comment

    • chroma
      V.I.P. Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 1976

      #3
      Originally posted by bvilleuk
      Easy Peasy!! You will find this will always happen if the antenna has not been
      discombobulated, which to put in simple terms (because I am a simple person)
      means the coaxial coefficient resistance does not match the downloaded
      compacitance when the current is in fluctuation mode, If on the other hand your
      Coat Hanger is of the coated kind you will get a much improved reception
      provided the ohms is not higher than the htz (if that were the case you would be
      making toast). You can of course fine tune the static, with a variable static
      tuner, once you have tuned out the white noise (no racial slur intended), you
      are left with a smooth sinewave, with a little glass paper you can produce a
      rough sinewave which you demodulate to your herts (get it!) content, no will
      understand you, but they never do anyway.

      Hope this helps Pat -- now where did I put my pink tablets........

      Worst case of missmatched impedence and standing wave ratio problems ever there bile.

      Ive often wondered why we dont have a digital kaos wiki.

      I mean we could have a thread asking questions by people who dont know what the hell "CHMOD 777" or some other mundane (although appropriate) question means and people could respond in with the answer while a group of trusted members colate all the data from that into our very own wiki.

      Guides could be updated on to it and it could act as a central hub for all the wealth of knowledge contained in DK.
      This would also mean that theres no need to download the text files from the downloads section, cause they would be readily available to everyone.

      That way when a person asks a mundane question that gets asked every five minuites you just need to post a link to the wiki entry and let them have at it, as opposed to desperately trying to focus your mind into no spamming with hate filled flames at the happless user

      Its also a hell of a lot easier to search through a wiki for information than it is to search a forum full of vague headings for useful information.

      imho this should have been in development years ago, especialy since the userbase has grown exponentialy and theres a valid need.
      He who laughs last thinks slowest.

      Comment

      • bvilleuk
        DK Veteran
        • Aug 2009
        • 625

        #4
        [quote=chroma;375412]
        Worst case of missmatched impedence and standing wave ratio problems ever there bile.
        It is a little vague -- but have you ever been discombobulated early in the morning -- I have, and it makes your eyes water I can tell you.........

        Ive often wondered why we dont have a digital kaos wiki.

        I mean we could have a thread asking questions by people who dont know what the hell "CHMOD 777" or some other mundane (although appropriate) question means and people could respond in with the answer while a group of trusted members colate all the data from that into our very own wiki.
        Do what I do and just "GOOGLE" everything...... it's amazing what you can find out on there........
        .
        .
        .
        WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
        .
        CAPITAL !!
        .
        BRING IT BACK...............
        .
        .

        Comment

        • patkins
          V.I.P. Member
          • Oct 2009
          • 3662

          #5
          Gee,thanks bvilleuk. For a moment I was toying with having to remove the quiverbinder on the laughing shaft again and replace it with two Webber down draught carbs, decoking the tranduction channel and over infusing the metaphysical geo stationary carbuncle to + or _ 0,77 nana perms. P.S. H ow do you GOOGLE something. Does it involve putting a drinking straw down my throat after an exceptionally large meal or is that regurgitate. Back in a mo, need to consult Wiki,.
          Last edited by patkins; 17 December, 2009, 13:32. Reason: embarrasment

          Comment

          • bvilleuk
            DK Veteran
            • Aug 2009
            • 625

            #6
            Originally posted by pat kinsella
            Gee,thanks bvilleuk. For a moment I was toying with having to remove the quiverbinder on the laughing shaft again and replace it with two Webber down draught carbs, decoking the tranduction channel and over infusing the metaphysical geo stationary carbuncle to + or _ 0,77 nana perms. P.S. H ow do you GOOGLE something. Does it involve putting a drinking straw down my throat after an exceptionally large meal or is that regurgitate. Back in a mo, need to consult Wiki,.
            As I mentioned earlier [waiting for the pink tablets to kick in....] total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence
            univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The
            precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in "self-alienation," not "self-identity, itself in self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and "actual other," "itself," not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).

            Light travels at 186,000 miles per second.
            That's 6 trillion miles an hour.
            If we could travel at light speed we would never age.
            Unfortunately, sniffing glue doesn't get you up to this speed.
            Now you know.
            And much good may it do you.
            Avoid regurgitation at all costs..........

            .
            .
            WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
            .
            CAPITAL !!
            .
            BRING IT BACK...............
            .
            .

            Comment

            • zaphodbb
              DK Daddy PT
              • Jan 2009
              • 1083

              #7
              hmmm thot me and t2p were the stoners on here, ah well live and learn.

              Comment

              • patkins
                V.I.P. Member
                • Oct 2009
                • 3662

                #8
                Originally posted by bvilleuk
                As I mentioned earlier [waiting for the pink tablets to kick in....] total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence
                univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The
                precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in "self-alienation," not "self-identity, itself in self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and "actual other," "itself," not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).

                Light travels at 186,000 miles per second.
                That's 6 trillion miles an hour.
                If we could travel at light speed we would never age.
                Unfortunately, sniffing glue doesn't get you up to this speed.
                Now you know.
                And much good may it do you.
                Avoid regurgitation at all costs..........

                Know what you mean,bvilleuk, but my original plan was to get the dictionary up and running so that I could patent one of the two names I had for it. The names (cleverly using DK in them) are DiKipedia or DorKipidia. When the money came rolling in from the copyright I was going to take my deck chair and pina colada to the beach and just lie there in the mid-day downpour watching the ever approaching globally warmed rise in sea level.P.S. I will give the dictionary idea a miss considering the tumultious support that I have received.

                Comment

                • gmb45
                  Admin Assistant
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 7538

                  #9
                  bulk order of anti shite pills needed df
                  support mountain resue

                  support digital-kaos here


                  forum rules

                  no keygens or torrents to be posted no autodata discussions

                  pish pt walkers


                  Comment

                  • jasbo7
                    V.I.P. Member
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1432

                    #10
                    please move to the comedy secton...as we dont have a phycology section...

                    Comment

                    • bvilleuk
                      DK Veteran
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 625

                      #11
                      Originally posted by jasbo7
                      please move to the comedy secton...as we dont have a phycology section...
                      We don't have one of them -- or a spell checkur either by the looks of it.......
                      .
                      .
                      WHAT DO I THINK OF CAPITAL PUNISHMENT??
                      .
                      CAPITAL !!
                      .
                      BRING IT BACK...............
                      .
                      .

                      Comment

                      • chroma
                        V.I.P. Member
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 1976

                        #12
                        Originally posted by bvilleuk
                        As I mentioned earlier [waiting for the pink tablets to kick in....] total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self). This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence
                        univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The
                        precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light. The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in "self-alienation," not "self-identity, itself in self-alienation" "released" in and by "otherness," and "actual other," "itself," not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).

                        Light travels at 186,000 miles per second.
                        That's 6 trillion miles an hour.
                        If we could travel at light speed we would never age.
                        Unfortunately, sniffing glue doesn't get you up to this speed.
                        Now you know.
                        And much good may it do you.
                        Avoid regurgitation at all costs..........

                        This accurately sums up the first lecture in Epistemology and Metaphysics i ever took.

                        Have you considered a career in teaching Bvilleuk?
                        Its a good job, holidays are great and you get to wear a tweed jacket and ogle perplexed university chicks looking for "extra credit." as a bonus you get paid to relocate to an area where nagra3 hasnt hit yet
                        He who laughs last thinks slowest.

                        Comment

                        Working...