Real shock, not

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GastonJ
    V.I.P. Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 5505

    #1

    Real shock, not

    Home Secretary Theresa May is coming under pressure to investigate claims Britain's electronic listening post GCHQ has been gathering data through a secret US spy programme.
    Keith Vaz, chairman of the home affairs committee, said the allegations were "chilling".
    According to The Guardian, GCHQ had access to data covertly gathered from leading internet firms in the US.
    GCHQ said it operated within a "strict legal and policy framework".
    The Guardian says it has obtained documents showing that the secret listening post, based at Cheltenham, had access to the Prism system, set up by America's National Security Agency (NSA), since at least June 2010.

    BBC News - Concern grows over GCHQ Prism spying allegations

    Must be a shock, perhaps she forgot about Echelon as well

    ECHELON - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Maybe someone should also tell her that the CIA are also carrying out industrial spying on worldwide companies as well and passing that information to American companies to get ahead of the rest of the world. Maybe she missed that one.

    Perhaps she needs to look at the definition of "Spying".....
    My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
    Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
    No good deed goes unpunished....

  • Kalipo
    DK Veteran
    • Mar 2008
    • 1687

    #2
    Why we even bothered??

    Only people moaning about bedroom tax is scroungers.. GET A F******* job!!

    Only people moaning about being listened to is terrorists and criminals.. If you've got nothing to hide.. NO PROBLEM get listening!!

    And the BBC isnt a good source for news!
    ich bin stolz ein deutscher zu sein.

    Meathead Lufter Verein - iScheitern

    Comment

    • Meat-Head
      V.I.P. Member
      • Oct 2009
      • 32000

      #3
      Damm it. Not sure if was Inhland or Emerica but short story is some bloke went to hitel on spec and room bas bugged, hiw did they bug room so quivk, unkess pre bugged riom?


      hate idhit

      sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

      Comment

      • Canker_Canison
        V.I.P. Member
        • May 2010
        • 3905

        #4
        Originally posted by Kalipo
        Only people moaning about being listened to is terrorists and criminals.. If you've got nothing to hide.. NO PROBLEM get listening!!
        Tell that to the guy refused entry to the US for a holiday because of a post he made on faceshite.

        The problem is that innocent people get marked just because they have said certain words in an email, text or phone call.

        How long before we have 'political prisoners'? Speaking out against the government could become a very dangerous path... even if you don't break the law.

        Lets put it another way... how effective are the security services when people known as a security risk are still allowed to murder a soldier on a london street? Makes you wonder what they do with all the information they gather when they don't stop the terrorists.
        Canker

        "Animal, vegetable or mineral... I'll do anything, to anything, with anything"
        - The Baby Eating Bishop of Bath & Wells
        [COLOR=Green]

        Comment

        • Kalipo
          DK Veteran
          • Mar 2008
          • 1687

          #5
          Originally posted by Canker_Canison
          Tell that to the guy refused entry to the US for a holiday because of a post he made on faceshite.

          The problem is that innocent people get marked just because they have said certain words in an email, text or phone call.

          How long before we have 'political prisoners'? Speaking out against the government could become a very dangerous path... even if you don't break the law.

          Lets put it another way... how effective are the security services when people known as a security risk are still allowed to murder a soldier on a london street? Makes you wonder what they do with all the information they gather when they don't stop the terrorists.
          Cross border aren't really nothing to do with the UK.. but if you say something on f*ckbook then you have a problem. If, i was to say something that sounded like something else when im visiting another country and that country was on high alert then it would be my fault, and i should expect to face questioning.. (cant say much as im flying tomorrow myself).

          Political prisoners are nothing new! Stalin imprisoned people for speaking out and slaugthered his own people. even when they where eating each other because he took the food from them.. countless American presidents have imprisoned thousands if not millions of its own people for being black or for white/black relationships.... the British have slaughtered millions upon millions for protesting against the way they're ruling.. The polish slaughtered 30,000 of its german speaking people after ww1.

          All that and nobody questions anything??

          The security services can only do as much as they can.. theyre never going to be 100% effective.. after all theyre only human.. probably 70% of there information is handed to them from spies or fellow human beings who are concerned!
          ich bin stolz ein deutscher zu sein.

          Meathead Lufter Verein - iScheitern

          Comment

          • Kalipo
            DK Veteran
            • Mar 2008
            • 1687

            #6
            NEWS JUST IN!!

            British imigration officers in action!!

            ich bin stolz ein deutscher zu sein.

            Meathead Lufter Verein - iScheitern

            Comment

            • TheCoder
              DK Veteran
              • Jun 2011
              • 693

              #7
              Why is it that these 'major' stories aren't reported by the press until several years AFTER they are pretty much common knowledge. I thought everyone was already aware of the US prism project and the 'secret' court orders to various telecoms/internet providers so why has it suddenly become a major non-story ?

              Comment

              • Meat-Head
                V.I.P. Member
                • Oct 2009
                • 32000

                #8
                Originally posted by Canker_Canison
                Tell that to the guy refused entry to the US for a holiday because of a post he made on faceshite.

                The problem is that innocent people get marked just because they have said certain words in an email, text or phone call.

                .
                Rumor states if your cell phone is on Vodashit if you send text with certain words
                the system logs it

                The name of Freddiy Mercerys band

                It cost a b00mb

                and few others

                Was you refering to this thraed?




                Took me like an hour to find that, hope your happy

                sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

                Comment

                • maca
                  Mr. DK DJ
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 6310

                  #9
                  cell phone **** off i thought you where from england ..

                  Comment

                  • Meat-Head
                    V.I.P. Member
                    • Oct 2009
                    • 32000

                    #10
                    Originally posted by maca
                    cell phone **** off i thought you where from england ..
                    Yeah from ingland. I did sent you a pm july 2011 was going to see you but you was "off line" and unable to reply

                    sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

                    Comment

                    • GastonJ
                      V.I.P. Member
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 5505

                      #11
                      And here we go with half truths now...

                      "Law-abiding" citizens have "nothing to fear" from the British intelligence services, the foreign secretary says.
                      So what does he class as a law abiding citizen? Someone who downloads music/movies is not law abiding and so fair target then?

                      William Hague said reports that the UK's eavesdropping centre GCHQ had circumvented the law to gather data on British citizens were "nonsense".
                      It's already been reported that they circumvented the law, why tell us something we already know? Or is he just re-emphasing that to make us feel happy about it?

                      The UK government has come under pressure to respond to allegations that Prism has allowed GCHQ to circumvent the formal legal process for obtaining personal material such as emails, photographs and videos, from internet companies based outside the UK.
                      Speaking on BBC One's Andrew Marr show, the foreign secretary declined to say whether or not he had personally authorised GCHQ to engage with Prism.
                      and his silence speak much louder than his words. If he was 100% certain he'd say "No I never have....." as it is he's going to make a statement, not answer questions.

                      "The net effect is that if you are a law-abiding citizen of this country going about your business and personal life, you have nothing to fear about the British state or intelligence agencies listening to the content of your phone calls or anything like that.
                      Speaking on BBC One's Andrew Marr show, the foreign secretary declined to say whether or not he had personally authorised GCHQ to engage with Prism.
                      It's a simple yes or no question. Too difficult for an MP to answer and expect them to tell the truth.

                      BBC News - Hague: Law-abiding Britons have nothing to fear from GCHQ

                      America's tech giants continued to deny any knowledge of a giant government surveillance programme called Prism, even as presidentBarack Obama confirmed the scheme's existence Friday.
                      With their credibility about privacy issues in sharp focus, all the technology companies said to be involved in the program issued remarkably similar statements.
                      All said they did not allow the government "direct access" to their systems, all said they had never heard of the Prism program, and all called for greater transparency.

                      Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg sharply deny knowledge of Prism until Thursday even as Obama confirms program's existence



                      Obama confirmed the existence of the scheme Friday and said Congress was "fully apprised" of the situation and that it was being conducted legally with a "whole range of safeguards involved".
                      But despite Obama's acknowledgment, senior figures said they remained puzzled and surprised by the news. Speaking off the record one said their company regularly complied with subpoenas for information but had never allowed "collection directly" from their servers.

                      Mark Zuckerberg, the founder and CEO of Facebook, described the press reports about Prism as "outrageous". He insisted that the Facebook was not part of any program to give the US government direct access to its servers.
                      He said: "Facebook is not and has never been part of any program to give the US or any other government direct access to our servers. We have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk, like the one Verizon reportedly received. And if we did, we would fight it aggressively. We hadn't even heard of Prism before yesterday." that's believable not
                      Last edited by GastonJ; 9 June, 2013, 14:00.
                      My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
                      Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
                      No good deed goes unpunished....

                      Comment

                      • Meat-Head
                        V.I.P. Member
                        • Oct 2009
                        • 32000

                        #12
                        Originally posted by GastonJ
                        And here we go with half





                        Mark Zuckerberg, the founder and CEO of Facebook, described the press reports about Prism as "outrageous". He insisted that the Facebook was not part of any program to give the US government direct access to its servers.
                        He said: "Facebook is not and has never been part of any program to give the US or any other government direct access to our servers. We have never received a blanket request or court order from any government agency asking for information or metadata in bulk, like the one Verizon reportedly received. And if we did, we would fight it aggressively. We hadn't even heard of Prism before yesterday." that's believable not

                        This is your quote againdt my quote so unless you or me providess a suitable link to back or claim up stale member situation

                        the fuzz can log into yoyr fakeb00k account eith no problrmd

                        google it.

                        sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

                        Comment

                        • Kalipo
                          DK Veteran
                          • Mar 2008
                          • 1687

                          #13
                          Originally posted by TheCoder
                          Why is it that these 'major' stories aren't reported by the press until several years AFTER they are pretty much common knowledge. I thought everyone was already aware of the US prism project and the 'secret' court orders to various telecoms/internet providers so why has it suddenly become a major non-story ?
                          Maybe its to hide other stories?? there is loads of reasons.. im never sure we will ever know the true reasons... . There is corruption.. and news that suits the governments at the time.. Think we call it brainwashing!

                          BUT! If you truly wanted 100% privacy and moan about this rule then you shouldn't use facebook, especially not with actual details about yourself and photos any random person (such as myself) can easily access.

                          Last edited by Kalipo; 16 June, 2013, 21:43.
                          ich bin stolz ein deutscher zu sein.

                          Meathead Lufter Verein - iScheitern

                          Comment

                          • GastonJ
                            V.I.P. Member
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 5505

                            #14
                            That should be Dave Cameron up there listening as well

                            The UK is tapping fibre-optic cables that carry global communications and gathering vast amounts of data, the Guardian has reported. The newspaper said its report was based on leaked documents from GCHQ, the UK's electronic eavesdropping agency.
                            The information from internet and phone use was stored for up to 30 days to be sifted and analysed, the paper said. GCHQ declined to comment on the claims but said its compliance with the law was "scrupulous".


                            In 2009, GCHQ issued an unusual statement in which it said it had no ambitions, expectations or plans for a database to store centrally all communications data in Britain, our correspondent added.
                            Nick Pickles, from privacy campaign group Big Brother Watch, said: "This appears to be dangerously close to, if not exactly, the centralised database of all our internet communications, including some content, that successive governments have ruled out and Parliament has never legislated for.


                            "If GCHQ have been intercepting huge numbers of innocent people's communications as part of a massive sweeping exercise, then I struggle to see how that squares with a process that requires a warrant for each individual intercept."
                            Shami Chakrabarti, director of human rights group Liberty, said she was shocked by the Guardian's report and accused GCHQ of allowing itself a "very generous interpretation of the law".



                            BBC News - GCHQ tapped fibre-optic cables for data, says newspaper

                            Of course they wouldn't comment, otherwise their own definition of compliance might be called into question.
                            My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
                            Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
                            No good deed goes unpunished....

                            Comment

                            • Meat-Head
                              V.I.P. Member
                              • Oct 2009
                              • 32000

                              #15
                              OFF TOPIC BUT RELEVENT

                              So here we have a fiber optic cable, chop, join, oh it dont work, need special fittings to rejoin, hrrrrm.

                              So was that pleb bloke chopping abd join fibervoptic?

                              but unless looking for certain posts is ut not useable data?

                              sigpicWas Banned For Being Certifiably Insane and Stupid

                              Comment

                              Working...