Play Ap2.5 Games On Any Drive

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Cronus
    Banned
    • Dec 2009
    • 692

    #16
    Originally posted by janobi
    I know a little more than the average joe in fairness. I know someone who is involved in TJ, and deals with C4 and Xecuter, hence the information I posted.

    All fw releases have been the result of a new wave release, except for LT which was due to the bans. However it still took 4 years for MS to be able to detect the drives, how much money was saved in that time? Surely enough to buy a new box. This is piracy after all. No guarantees offered. You pay your money you take your choice. Its that simple.

    Look at it logically. If MS could detect LT, would it not be better to just ban everyone again, increasing hardware sales 10 fold due to new boxes being purchased. The majority of boxes available are slim, which currently have no hack, stopping the majority of pirates. AP2.5 must of cost quite a few quid to develop and implement, surely MS would not spend this money if they had an easier way of stopping pirates? AP2.5 has been present since 2008, so why wait 2 years to implement it?

    None of us know how or what MS can detect, however no banhammer is a good indication that MS cannot detect the fw on the drive, as its virually a mirror of OFW.

    Dont throw your toys out of the pram, because someone disagrees with your opinion daz. And what has me having a degree have to do with it? I read all I can, speak to people in the loop and make my own informed decisions and conclusions. Which I then try and share with others of like mind. Your post is/was helpful to some people, but you haven't included all the information, which is needed for an informed decision.
    So you know a friend-of a friend-of a friend. I know someone who works in a government department..doesn't make me the ~~~~ing PM!

    All fw releases have been the result of a new wave release, except for LT which was due to the bans? Obviously and each one was to correct some mistake that C4eva made, even though EACH time he was certain 'he was the man!'
    So it took 4yrs for MS to detect the drives? Did it? Maybe I'm suspicious but I'd call that building up sales on a new console rather than what you say.
    The fact that there has been no banhammer yet is because of LT+. Why ban people before they've had chance to analyse what LT+ does?
    AP2.5 hasn't been used before because their detections have never needed it.
    Its like a game of chess and C4eva is always going to be on the losing side.

    Janobi,no toys out of the pram mate. You had a little pop with your attitude and I had one back. End of!

    I appreciate your negativity but it works both ways.

    We'll agree to disagree. Fair play mate.

    Comment

    • janobi
      V.I.P. Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 1624

      #17
      Originally posted by Cronus
      So you know a friend-of a friend-of a friend. I know someone who works in a government department..doesn't make me the ~~~~ing PM!

      All fw releases have been the result of a new wave release, except for LT which was due to the bans? Obviously and each one was to correct some mistake that C4eva made, even though EACH time he was certain 'he was the man!'
      So it took 4yrs for MS to detect the drives? Did it? Maybe I'm suspicious but I'd call that building up sales on a new console rather than what you say.
      The fact that there has been no banhammer yet is because of LT+. Why ban people before they've had chance to analyse what LT+ does?
      AP2.5 hasn't been used before because their detections have never needed it.
      Its like a game of chess and C4eva is always going to be on the losing side.

      Janobi,no toys out of the pram mate. You had a little pop with your attitude and I had one back. End of!

      I appreciate your negativity but it works both ways.

      We'll agree to disagree. Fair play mate.
      There was no negativity in my post. You must of read it that way Daz.

      I dont know a friend of a friend of a friend. I know someone in team jungle. Its that simple. You probably know him too, he is off the place you keep getting banned from He is massive in the xbox scene, part of team jungle, abgx uploader, official fw tester. Cant get much better than that mate.

      None of the fw releases were to correct mistakes, it was to boot new waves only. There may of been code adjustment there too, but main point was for new waves.

      Why would someone wait 4 years to ban people? Better to ban straight away, and build hardware sales. Wait 4 years, and some people may jump ship. Its logical that they didnt know how to detect fw prior to LT, even C4 himself said this.

      I never said the banhammer had been suspended due to LT+, however I do believe that its because of LT, as they cannot detect the fw on the drive, hence the introduction of ap2.5. As for their detections not requiring it, then why implement it. If they can detect other ways, why waste time and money adding this. This is the last throw of the dice for MS imho.

      I agree its cat and mouse, but its MS who are a step behind, as they always have to reverse C4's work, then work out how to use it against the scene.

      There was no attitude in my post at all. You have made sweeping comments, and I have corrected you on them. You aint come back with replies or evidence, merely picked up on other things and run with them to try and make your point. If you go back to your original post, I said this would get you banned, and you agreed. My second post was to say that you had copied and pasted the post, as you clearly stated YOU were banned, yet YOUR xval was clean. Therefore a clear copy and paste. Thats when you starting trying to have digs Daz, and not the other way around.

      There is nothing to agree to disagree about. Opinions are like assholes mate. Everyone has one

      All I am saying is, that the info you posted was not complete, and further info was required to make an informed decision.

      Comment

      • xXJediXx
        Top Poster +
        • Oct 2010
        • 214

        #18
        Sorry to come weighing into this ..

        But i have a flashed xbox 360 liteon drive -- flashed a year ago

        Recently downloaded the kinnect dash to it via live ..

        and installed ACB and got the 'unrecognised disc'

        Where would using this method leave me .. I dont intend to go on live with the console as i bought a new slim

        Can i use this method to play the games without a reflash .?

        Comment

        • cunny
          V.I.P. Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 4915

          #19
          Originally posted by xXJediXx
          Sorry to come weighing into this ..

          But i have a flashed xbox 360 liteon drive -- flashed a year ago

          Recently downloaded the kinnect dash to it via live ..

          and installed ACB and got the 'unrecognised disc'

          Where would using this method leave me .. I dont intend to go on live with the console as i bought a new slim

          Can i use this method to play the games without a reflash .?
          In a nutshell no. You updated the dash to kinect. Try and activate disk on your console to try determine what FW is on the drive
          sigpic

          "Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot."

          Comment

          • xXJediXx
            Top Poster +
            • Oct 2010
            • 214

            #20
            Originally posted by cunny
            In a nutshell no. You updated the dash to kinect. Try and activate disk on your console to try determine what FW is on the drive
            Sorry mate i dont know what you mean ..

            I have aboot disc that doesnt get the game runnin .i presume you mean somethign else .?

            Comment

            Working...