The best Digital receiver

[plamen.1973]

Hello guys!
I would like to know which receiver is the best?
What I mean the best?
-good for paching
-Ip connect
-sensitive tuner

[stavross]

Hello guys!
I would like to know which receiver is the best?
What I mean the best?
-good for paching
-Ip connect
-sensitive tuner

M8 Always linux linux linux

Wether it's a DM or Other I personally have a AZBox althougth still in beta stage (hense a lot of moans on this one) I think it has the ability to be better just not as yet still early days though or DM clones very cheap but try get a good one or go genuine up to you but as said linux oh yes linux linux. No ofense to any TM owners but really not a scratch on linux I now they'll try and persuede you otherwize I myself had a TM do you think I would go back now??? NO CHANCE

Hope this helps

Stavross

[machno]

Technomate has been the best & easiest to patch so far
machno

[stavross]

Technomate has been the best & easiest to patch so far
machno

Yes tm easier to patch but when there's nothing to patch in the future linux wins again anyway linux can be patched, emu,and loads more.
Like I said bought one wasted a hundread quid or 2 on them and cams when I could have bought a good linux receiver job done and saved a few quid.
Or waste money and get both and see for yourself which is best.

Stavross

[satsid]

Azbox now has blind scan in last firm/w,still needs work for blind scan atm.No linux box has blind scan apart from the azbox as far as i know.Also the azbox has a better format ress for HD channels than other boxes.End of the day Azbox is looking more like the right way to go.

[Manic01]

TM500/600 are linux and not cloned and cheap. TM HD for sale by end of Feb.

[stavross]

Azbox now has blind scan in last firm/w,still needs work for blind scan atm.No linux box has blind scan apart from the azbox as far as i know.Also the azbox has a better format ress for HD channels than other boxes.End of the day Azbox is looking more like the right way to go.

You said it Sid!
Totally agree Should have known TM would jump on the band wagon

Long live the great AZBox

Stavross

[satsid]

You said it Sid!
Totally agree Should have known TM would jump on the band wagon

Long live the great AZBox

Stavross

Hi Stavross,TM boxes i dont think are good receivers.All that can be said on TM receivers in past thay had good support,as a receiver thay are sh*t if im asked,& were over priced.All thay are are clones of clark tec & clark tec were cheeper.Azbox still needs work but gets better quite quick of late.2 many people in satellite dont look @ how good hardware is in a satellite box.Support & hardware get mixed up,if support is taken away,ask yourselfs this guys,what are you left with. apart from a pile of sh*t.

[machno]

My Technomate 5400 ci super cost only ?84 post free & patched, easy to update via usb & is more suited to newbies than the linux which will be for more knowledgeable persons. Both are good receivers, I have a Humax 2000 Hd receiver also which is very poor for updates in comparison to the Technomate and that cost ?200 + & wish that i had bought a 6800 or 6900 instead.

[stavross]

Hi Stavross,TM boxes i dont think are good receivers.All that can be said on TM receivers in past thay had good support,as a receiver thay are sh*t if im asked,& were over priced.All thay are are clones of clark tec & clark tec were cheeper.Azbox still needs work but gets better quite quick of late.2 many people in satellite dont look @ how good hardware is in a satellite box.Support & hardware get mixed up,if support is taken away,ask yourselfs this guys,what are you left with. apart from a pile of sh*t.

To true Sid!!!
Just like a well known cam I could mention!
Why do half a job Get a AZBox and get it all or any linux box maybe??????

Stavross

[terriers]

tm,s shit......all this forum,s turning into is a group of peep,s slagging off any box not owned by them!!! if you dont have a linux box then you cant be in the gang....

[plamen.1973]

Hello terriers.
Could you tell me more about linux box?
I like to change my tm 5200usb super and I looking for good receiver.

[mark fisher]

our lass usto be a good receiver ..ive got a tm 5400usb know less fiddling

[satsid]

tm,s shit......all this forum,s turning into is a group of peep,s slagging off any box not owned by them!!! if you dont have a linux box then you cant be in the gang....

linux box i have terriers without falling out.TM,S receivers i dont like & have used.Come on be fair tm,s menu from remote are horried.Im not slagging people off coz i dont like the tm boxes,or most of them.The Only one iv liked is the tm 5500 dapci.Myself after useing other satellite receivers,i would not get another tm.

[terriers]

i dont want to fall out m8....but i have to disagree...i think the tuner threshold on the tm,s are great and give you a pic on weak signals were others dont,plus easy to use and cccam available if you add a diablo wifi...just as much as a linux box,apart from 442 feeds that the azbox can handle...also spiderbox and dreamlink can handle ccam..and soon rumoured to be the nannox as well...so i think there,s life without linux...