Flat Earth

[nbtechnic]

Very good advice, done!
thank

[nara]

Very good advice, done!
thank

Still bollox though, but at least it's easier to read. t2001.gif

[nbtechnic]

Still bollox though, but at least it's easier to read. [ATTACH=CONFIG]893318[/ATTACH]

I redid the reading, it's true that it's messy
I tried to improve, I use a translator,
but it's not easy to convey a message with a translator,
when I write flat, the translator writes airplane,
it is incomprehensible for whoever reads the text.

[longwalkmouse]

Me mates g/f has flat chest !

[nara]

Me mates g/f has flat chest !

Probably a b/f.

[eeek]

Flag_of_the_United_Nations.svg.jpg


The United Nations know....look at their flag/emblem. North pole in the middle, Antarctica around the outside

[Meat-Head]

ON TOPIC:-

went to one of the street parties other week, world map on table.

guy didn’t seem impressed when said earth is flat!

[oscarr]

Flat Earth is one of most craziest concepts ever.
From some reason many people believe it is supported by the Bible, but it's enough just to read the beginning of the Book of Genesis to see the Earth has been created as unshaped rock.
There are also verses about dry land - where is also earth used, because in Hebrew earth and land is the same word.
So people makes mistake - because Bible says that on the beginning when earth was created it was covered by the water, but after that God separated water from water and dry land show up.
Some people believe this is the pancake flat earth - but I see this as continent.

[johnnyh33]

Probably a b/f.

Ha ha!
Made I laugh

[johnnyh33]

Nobody really beleives in flat earth, it's just bandied about with much more likely conspiracy theories to denigrate the much more likely theories. Simple.

[nara]

Nobody really beleives in flat earth, it's just bandied about with much more likely conspiracy theories to denigrate "the much more likely theories". Simple.

Tell me more about these much more likely theories. I'm intrigued.

[nbtechnic]

This means when we have no argument to defend ourselves, we simply say that we are a conspiracy theorist.
The truth is hidden in the Hollywood studios where the scenes of the lunar trip were filmed.
As luck would have it, NASA lost the film reels, and no longer has the technology to return to the moon.
How did the first astraunotes manage to return alive to the sardine can, with Van Alen's impassable belt?
-The real shape of the earth is not a theory, it is field observation,
-It is the testing of ball earth theories which is not observable and not reproducible in the field,
-If Antarctica is not a circular wall of ice around the continents, why prohibit access to it? The problem would quickly be resolved and put an end to the claims of the terraplaters!

[nara]

This means when we have no argument to defend ourselves, we simply say that we are a conspiracy theorist.
The truth is hidden in the Hollywood studios where the scenes of the lunar trip were filmed.
As luck would have it, NASA lost the film reels, and no longer has the technology to return to the moon.
How did the first astraunotes manage to return alive to the sardine can, with Van Alen's impassable belt?
-The real shape of the earth is not a theory, it is field observation,
-It is the testing of ball earth theories which is not observable and not reproducible in the field,
-If Antarctica is not a circular wall of ice around the continents, why prohibit access to it? The problem would quickly be resolved and put an end to the claims of the terraplaters!

"Terraplaters"? I'm familiar with the usual conspiracy theory bollocks above, but none of the search engines can tell me what a terraplater is.

Who are they, and what do they claim?

[johnnyh33]

I think for you Nara a conspiracy theory is anything that doesn't agree with the "government" or official explanation of events. A famous one which I imagine you have heard of is the Kennedy assassination where the official explanation says a lone shooter did it although there were dozens of people ready to testify to the Warren commission that there was at least one other shooter, these testimonies were not "required" by the commission to reach it's verdict that there was only one shooter. Also the observable physical evidence of the bullets' trajectories was ignored because that pointed to a second gunman as well.

The second gunman explanation for the Kennedy assassination, backed up by physical evidence and eye-witness testimony is much more likely than flat-earth, wouldn't you agree ?

[V3t3r]

https://youtu.be/rpBnurznFio