conspiracy the moon

[Cronus]

There are at least three pieces of hardware on the Moon that are not in dispute. Apollos 11, 14 and 15 erected laser reflectors on the lunar surface.

But did they??


The laser test theory proves absolutely nothing. People who feel its their mission in life to disprove the moon landing hoax always use the reflectors as their greatest trump card but it is essentially a futile argument.

NASA did send unmanned spacecraft to the Moon prior to the Moon landings.

Surveyor 1 - 30 May 1966
Surveyor 3 - 20 April 1967
Surveyor 5 - 8 September 1967
Surveyor 6 - 7 November 1967
Surveyor 7 - 7 January 1968

The Surveyors landed on the surface successfully 5 times out of 7 attempts.

Surveyor to the Moon (1966 - 1968)

They used reflectors on the moon to determine the distance that the moon is from the earth. They needed exact numbers to achieve a lunar landing.

So I'll say it again.

Reflectors on the moon are not proof that there were people on the moon.

[KenshinPT]

The man in the Moon is true!

And you ask: Why?

The competition between USA and URSS to put the man in the Moon was huge.

Both were very alert to any moves made by the other nation.

When USA put the first man in the Moon, URSS had all their scopes and satellites pointed to the moon to check the veracity of the the mission.

If the USA's mission was fake, URSS would show immediately to the world all the proofs of that fake mission.

As, URSS and USA were/are rivals I don't believe that URSS would pact with USA of this fake story.

So, the conclusion is: The man in the Moon is true.

[wispa]

well non of the trips to the moon and holidays promised, never took place since the big moon landing.
if anything tech has moved so far advanced that we should of had little apartments for everyone....

[thered]

But did they??


The laser test theory proves absolutely nothing. People who feel its their mission in life to disprove the moon landing hoax always use the reflectors as their greatest trump card but it is essentially a futile argument.

NASA did send unmanned spacecraft to the Moon prior to the Moon landings.

Surveyor 1 - 30 May 1966
Surveyor 3 - 20 April 1967
Surveyor 5 - 8 September 1967
Surveyor 6 - 7 November 1967
Surveyor 7 - 7 January 1968

The Surveyors landed on the surface successfully 5 times out of 7 attempts.

Surveyor to the Moon (1966 - 1968)

They used reflectors on the moon to determine the distance that the moon is from the earth. They needed exact numbers to achieve a lunar landing.

So I'll say it again.

Reflectors on the moon are not proof that there were people on the moon.

i will agree with that i think chroma has stated the same in the thread means nothing to me any robo device could have done it

40 years on where are we?

thing is its not something you can prove or disprove unless you got access too the moon

the crap footage,the lack of movement on the ground when the rocket fires up (NO crater) the apollo crew on whatever mission look like they on string,van allen, light where there should be shadows

lets face it the evidence to say we went to the moon is poor at best but how do you disprove it ? other than actually going

[Mally_BUK]

i haven't seen any compeling evidence to proove they didn't go to the moon

[RedSpider]

i went to the moon. it was crap. i came home.
or do i mean skegness? one of them. i always get them 2 confused

[lickerdyslick]

mythbusters made a mini version of the moon landing with lights positioned where there was supposed to be lights e.t.c. and they proved the moon landing was true, ok i knows these guys are nuts but i now believe the landing was true.

[frankharrison]

Anybody think the same as me? They landed on the moon BUT the photos are not from the landings. The pictures were so poor they had to do something and put out photos taken from training.
That's why there are slight problems with the photos.
The video that everyone sees now is a copy of what was transmitted so it's hard to determine what's real and edited.
If they hadn't have gone I think that countries tracking them would have said something.

[johnnyquango]

caveman .you are as quick to rubbish these conspiracies as others are to accept them?what are your beliefs based upon.empty vessels haven't the right to make the most noises

[nara]

caveman .you are as quick to rubbish these conspiracies as others are to accept them?what are your beliefs based upon.empty vessels haven't the right to make the most noises

Which post by caveman are you referring to? Has he made any in this thread?

[racin-snake]

think you have just got mixed up and confused again m8
nige contributed on the first page of the thread about 3 posts ?

but i think he is calling someone a "caveman" and saying that
some are quick to believe this stuff and ....
some are just as quick to dismiss it

without either giving a second look at the facts or lack off in either direction
then shouting there mouth off ...without actually knowing the full facts or just assuming they know

you need to try a bit harder at reading the posts mate as this one might be tricky
but you are quite often confused aint ya ?

[Cronus]

think you have just got mixed up and confused again m8

i think he is calling someone a "caveman" and saying that
some are quick to believe this stuff and ....
some are just as quick to dismiss it

without either giving a second look at the facts or lack off in either direction
then shouting there mouth off ...without actually knowing the full facts or just assuming they know

you need to try a bit harder at reading the posts mate as this one might be tricky
but you are quite often confused aint ya ?

[caveman_nige]

caveman .you are as quick to rubbish these conspiracies as others are to accept them?what are your beliefs based upon.empty vessels haven't the right to make the most noises

I am sorry are you talking to me...? maybe you should read everything first before you wite an inane comment like that. I have no wish to participate further in this thread and have not done so for almost two years.. Why not address you comments to people who are active in here and willing to give you their opinions.. Merry Christmas.

[nara]

but i think he is calling someone a "caveman" and saying that
some are quick to believe this stuff and ....
some are just as quick to dismiss it

Ah, getcha! Thanks (I still don't know who he's referring to, but we'll let that pass.)

Anyhow, when you are dealing with accepted fact, backed up with a body of evidence, it's up to those who disagree to make their case.

The "What are your beliefs based on" question is therefore both silly and redundant.

His "empty vessels" taunt is juvenile and ignorant.

[racin-snake]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKONhVl7Sr8&feature=player_detailpage]YouTube - ***x202a;A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon Part 1***x202c;‏[/ame]


there are a few videos for this film split into segments
pretty good and well researched worth a real good look plenty of info revealed and backed up with fact and dated info too

have a look and then see if it was in fact possible to go to the moon ?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA0D6vZuQ6Y&feature=player_detailpage]YouTube - ***x202a;A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon 2/5***x202c;‏[/ame]

pretty impressive but more so the facts deemed not worth comment from nasa

and also look at the faces of the astronauts says it all really

if i had been one of the only people to have went to the moon i think i would have been smiling
even just for the fact id survived the van allen belt