conspiracy the moon

**nara** · 2 July, 2011, 21:04

Originally posted by racin-snake

...even just for the fact id survived the van allen belt

Why would that be a problem?

" It took Apollo only about an hour to pass through the worst part of the radiation belts - once on the outbound trip and once again on the return trip. The total radiation dose received by the astronauts was about one rem. A person will experience radiation sickness with a dose of 100-200 rem, and death with a dose of 300+ rem. Clearly the doses received fall well below anything that could be considered a significant risk. Despite claims that "lead shielding meters thick would have been needed", NASA found it unnecessary to provide any special radiation shielding.

The hoax advocates also make the mistake of limiting themselves to two-dimensional thinking. The Van Allen Radiation Belts consist of a doughnut-shaped region centered on Earth's magnetic equator. The translunar trajectories followed by the Apollo spacecraft were typically inclined about 30 degrees to Earth's equator, therefore Apollo bypassed all but the edges of the radiation belts, greatly reducing the exposure."

The Moon Hoax Debate

**racin-snake** · 2 July, 2011, 21:13

mmmm watch the film come back with somic solid

as again you fail dismally

watch somic out of your usual mate .........it might inform you to make better more informed decisions and comments

as in this case your copy and paste contains nothing of worth to the debate
(as usual )

and again can you summarize or plagiarise something from another site to claim otherwise to the other comments made in my post ?
again not the info but the poster , suitably noted on all your previous claptrap

go on amaze us with something of your own ?

but i sorely ~~~~in doubt it

just like nasa ...=Never A Straight Answer

..nara =Never A Realistic Argument

**nara** · 2 July, 2011, 23:24

Originally posted by racin-snake

as in this case your copy and paste contains nothing of worth to the debate
(as usual )

and again can you summarize or plagiarise something from another site to claim otherwise to the other comments made in my post ?

So your copy and pasting (or plagiarising, if you prefer) of a couple of YouTube videos is a worthy addition to the debate?

It's an interesting, if rather bizarre, viewpoint.

**cablefreejunkie** · 3 July, 2011, 00:04

Originally posted by racin-snake

YouTube - ***x202a;A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon Part 1***x202c;&rlm;

there are a few videos for this film split into segments
pretty good and well researched worth a real good look plenty of info revealed and backed up with fact and dated info too

have a look and then see if it was in fact possible to go to the moon ?

YouTube - ***x202a;A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon 2/5***x202c;&rlm;

pretty impressive but more so the facts deemed not worth comment from nasa

and also look at the faces of the astronauts says it all really

if i had been one of the only people to have went to the moon i think i would have been smiling
even just for the fact id survived the van allen belt

survived the van allen belt !!!!! no chance !!!!

**racin-snake** · 3 July, 2011, 00:18

not so norah...if you apply the fact ime showing the films to add more to the debate and also giving a factual outlook with more than a quote and one line
thats seems to be YOUR modus operandi
Digital Kaos
its here for everyone to see

your input of all the posts ive ever seen you make ...."one line and a quote"

never once have i seen one be objective with any constructive criticism

nor once considered what you deem to be facts as being slightly in the greyer area

i wish you could possibly contribute more as your posts are slightly nieve and mostly bunkum with no debate just copy and paste !
with never a thought as to what you've been fed by the media and PR dept of these authorities would in fact be a huge slice of BS
mostly though you do not debate but simply try to condemn the evidence by nothing but a line of silly insignificant twaddle

must be lovely in your black and white world to have the total handle on the truth mate as everyone knows its infeasible and non realistic outlook to think everyone else is wrong except nara ?
even expert testimonies and mistakes dated pictures and other evidence are mostly bypassed to just attempt to have a go at the poster not the content of the actual evidence provided

if everyone that has an opinion here are all wrong and conspiracy nuts then why post your efforts here at all ?
plenty other parts of the forum to look at than trolling here if you just cannot entertain anything but the official line of the government and or agency involved ?

either bring something to the debate or don't join in
as most if not all of your input on most of your posts are trolling attempts pure and simple
i see this everywhere you post not just here on DK
nothing to offer but unrealistic claptrap
be nice for once you enter a debate rather than instigate (troll)
as your input is nothing more than this "as per usual"

this will be a big quote for you

anyhoo your post as always is just as i say total rubbish

i also see why you think i have a bizarre outlook
mainly because i like to look at all sides not what i am spoon-fed
(saying that if your elderly that might be second nature now )

have a look at the film (not a silly youtube video )as in this format its easier to convey the facts that have been queried regarding the nasa evidence for easier consumption and which nasa failed to comment on to show their evidence to be factual !
they just refused comment and no production of any evidence to refute the facts this film implied !

and then come back with a definition of what "they claim in the film ".....to be non factual

with some sort of thesis to back your evidence THEN DEBATE (WITH MORE THAN ONE LINE AND A QUOTE !!)

and maybe show your thoughts on these matters ?

instead of your usual Victor Meldrew impersonation

hopefully it might improve your memory too ? so theraputic too perhaps ?

**super jumbe** · 3 July, 2011, 23:28

nara, I thought I was the only person hear copy and paste??.
Consider looking at yours, before jumping to others!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

**nara** · 4 July, 2011, 08:59

Originally posted by super jumbe

nara, I thought I was the only person hear copy and paste***8230;***8230;.
Consider looking at yours, before jumping to others!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lol, there's a world of difference between pasting an unattributed news story under your own name, and using an attributed quote to illustrate a point.

You should do some research on the basics of forum etiquette.

(and I'm not the only one who's been trying to get that message across to you.)

**racin-snake** · 4 July, 2011, 09:49

unfortunately the lesson your trying to teach superjumbe
might actually be better off used by yourself

you have an abrasive and somewhat annoying type of forum etiquette yourself
don't you understand this being an english speaking forum there are people her are not in fact using their mother tongue?
so the language barrier problem has to be taken into consideration

maybe the thought here might trigger some sort of adjustment to your particularly stupefied posting format ?

just a thought you could do with taking on board

**nara** · 4 July, 2011, 10:12

Originally posted by racin-snake

don't you understand this being an english speaking forum there are people her are not in fact using their mother tongue?
so the language barrier problem has to be taken into consideration

I may have commented on the rambling nature of your posts in the past, but I don't think I have ever mocked your use of English.

My apologies if I have.

**racin-snake** · 4 July, 2011, 10:25

my last post on this as its misdirecting the thread of which i am particularly interested in

but please read my post again ....
i am saying that superjumbe is not using his mother tongue english is not his first language
so if his posting and the information you are trying to convey is confusing the whole idea of his posts being slightly off are to do with the language barrier not intellect or stupidity
but simply put hes got a big hurdle when using english

be aware many on this forum are not speaking english as their first language
but are in fact trying and thankfully succeeding to produce some input using english which is a hard enough language for some
and somewhat confusing to learn in its written form
so please take this consideration into account before extracting the urine
hopefully now we can debate the actual treads intended question
please

**frankharrison** · 4 July, 2011, 10:30

Landings real.

Photos/video fake/enhanced. Shot on Earth as backup.

**racin-snake** · 4 July, 2011, 10:36

hi Frank care to elaborate on these comments ?

be nice to see the angle for these comments are coming from see where it goes ect

just looking at some studies done on the zero gravity affect and the space suits dexterity under these conditions
and reconstructions using suit inflation and tethers to provide the illusion if zero gravity
with some outstanding results right here on earth
ile post it as soon as i can when i get time

also might write to nasa to ask where i can buy the batteries they used on the hasselblad camera they used as the temp variation they withstood is even in modern terms outstanding if not unbelievable

**Kalipo** · 4 July, 2011, 17:02

HAHA @ this thread.. hi nara at your old tricks again i see

..

Anyway, the thread. I'm not going to go into this as i admittedly know sweet FA about the subject..

But for sake of the arugmentative people. we cannot and will not know the truth about wether or not the landings occured. Unless the US goverment say otherwise..

But last month or so ago i read an article where moon rock was supposadly stolen by an astronaut who smuggled the rock in his clothing etc.. he was caught trying to sell the rocks.. It's a criminal offence the the US to take rock from the moon

..

It seems that this story will never go away and its pretty sad for someone to argue and fall out if/not/when it happened when they will never be able to truly prove otherwise..

And oh yeah, i read very early in the thread (yes ive read the hole lot) a member (didnt catch the name) was quoting "URSS" its USSR FFS

**racin-snake** · 4 July, 2011, 18:40

i take slight offence as to whether you or anyone thinks it "SAD"
to ask questions about events reported that later found have big factual holes in evidence provided
i also find it amusing that some who claim this will argue over whether a goal scored in 1966 was in or out (see the relevance ?)
so different strokes for different folk

yet i don't see me going on a thread on sport and calling these guys sad ?
in all i find it rather interesting and sometimes surprising that government agency's get away with such bullshit

while others argue with an opinon on whether a member of football team or a sportsman has the right to shag who they like ect ?
(this makes no sense to me anyway)

but hey ho such is life

also the poster made a mistake with USSR but in your post:

[QUOTE]And oh yeah, i read very early in the thread (yes ive read the hole lot) a member (didnt catch the name) was quoting "URSS" its USSR FFS [QUOTE]

" hole lot "would be "whole lot "

easily done eh ?

**nara** · 4 July, 2011, 18:40

Originally posted by Kalipo

HAHA @ this thread.. hi nara at your old tricks again i see

..

Lol, it's tough, but somebody's got to do it.

Originally posted by Kalipo

...I read very early in the thread (yes ive read the hole lot)

It's nice to see somebody who bothers to reads the whole thread before reaching for the keyboard. It seems to be a dying art these days.

conspiracy the moon

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment