kennedy assassination

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • piopat
    DK Veteran
    • May 2008
    • 708

    #46
    ce399 (commision exhibit 399) or the magic bullet as it is now called was the bullet (so we were told ) that struck both jfk and connally entering jfks back at the right of the spine in the shoulder area and then exiting his throath (in the adams apple area ) where it then struck connally in the area just under his right armpit (all most at the point where the back curves into his side ) the bullet then exits connallys chest (shattering numerous inches of his fifth rib ) it then struck connally in the right wrist (shattering that ) and exited his wrist and lodged in his left thigh where it fell out of connallys thigh and was found on a stretcher in parklands hospital . well thats the official story and what we were told by the warren commision , but how could the warren commision say that when they knew it wasnt backed up in anyway by the medical evidence .here is ce399 .





    what was the medical evidence ?


    Mr. SPECTER. Dr. Humes, under your opinion which you have just given us, what effect, if any, would that have on whether this bullet, 399, could have been the one to lodge in Governor Connally's thigh?

    Commander HUMES. I think that extremely unlikely. The reports, again Exhibit 392 from Parkland, tell of an entrance wound on the lower midthigh of the Governor, and X-rays taken there are described as showing metallic fragments in the bone, which apparently by this report were not removed and are still present in Governor Connally's thigh. I can't conceive of where they came from this missile.

    Representative FORD. The missile identified as Exhibit 399.

    Commander HUMES. 399, sir.


    Mr. SPECTER. And could it [CE 399] have been the bullet which inflicted the wound on Governor Connally's right wrist?
    Colonel FINCK. No; for the reason that there are too many fragments described in that wrist.


    Mr. SPECTER. Mr. Frazier, is it possible for the fragments identified in Commission Exhibit 840 to have come from the whole bullet heretofore identified as Commission Exhibit 399?

    Mr. FRAZIER. I would say that based on weight it would be highly improbable that that much weight could have come from the base of that bullet since its present weight is--its weight when I first received it was 158.6 grains.

    Mr. SPECTER. Referring now to 399.

    Mr. FRAZIER. Exhibit 399, and its original normal weight would be 160 to 161 grains, and those three metal fragments had a total of 2.1 grains as I recall--2.3 grains. So it is possible but not likely since there is only a very small part of the core of the bullet 399 missing.


    Mr. SPECTER: What is your opinion as to whether bullet 399 could have inflicted all of the wounds on the Governor, then, without respect at this point to the wound of the President's neck?
    Dr. SHAW. I feel that there would be some difficulty in explaining all of the wounds as being inflicted by bullet Exhibit 399 without causing more in the way of loss of substance to the bullet or deformation of the bullet.


    Mr. SPECTER. In your opinion, based on the tests which you have performed, was the damage inflicted on Governor Connally's wrist caused by a pristine bullet, a bullet fired from the Mannlicher-Carcano rifle 6.5 missile which did not hit anything before it struck the Governor's wrist?

    Dr. OLIVIER. I don't believe so. I don't believe his wrist was struck by a pristine bullet.

    Mr. SPECTER. What is the reason for your conclusion on that?

    Dr. OLIVIER. In this case I go by the size of the entrance wound and exit wound on the Governor's wrist. The entrance wound was on the dorsal surface, it was described by the surgeon as being much larger than the exit wound. He said he almost overlooked that on the volar aspect of the wrist.

    In every instance we had a larger exit wound than an entrance wound firing with a pristine bullet apparently at the same angle at which it entered and exited the Governor's wrist. Also, and I don't believe they were mixed up on which was entrance and exit. For one thing the clothing, you know, the surgeon found pieces of clothing and the other thing the human anatomy is such that I don't believe it would enter through the volar aspect and out the top.

    So I am pretty sure that the Governor's wrist was not hit by a pristine or a stable bullet.


    Mr. PURDY: Dr. Wecht, is it your opinion that no bullet could have caused all of the wounds to President Kennedy and Governor Connally or the Commission exhibit 399 could not have caused all of the wounds to both men?

    Dr. WECHT: Based upon the findings in this case, it is my opinion that no bullet could have caused all these wounds, not only 399 but no other bullet that we know about or any fragment of any bullet that we know about in this case.


    above are fragments removed from connallys wrist and a large fragment was in his leg untill the day he died ,but there were more fragments in the wrist
    Dr. BADEN: [After asking for and receiving the above wrist X-ray of Governor Connally] The wrist was explored and operated on, and recovered from the wrist was some cloth fabric which matched the jacket of Connally. Thank you. And the largest of those metal fragments, I think there are three fragments that are visible from this distance, overlay the distal radius near the wrist - the largest of those three fragments was removed by the surgeons in the course of their operation and preserved, kept at the Archives and made available to the committee many years later.
    Mr. FITHIAN: The other fragments were not removed?

    Dr. BADEN: The other fragments were not removed and are still present as demonstrated on subsequent X-rays available to the committee when the Governor's arm was healing.

    lets have another look at ce399 and see if we still think that bullet caused all the wounds in both jfk and connally (excluding the head shot ) and left all those fragments


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OyI0P6WYIY&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - ‪Dr. Shaw- "bullet still in leg"?!?! 11/22/63‬‏[/ame]
    proof the bullet found on the stretcher in parklands ce399 was not the bullet that lodged in connallys leg becuase that bullet was still in connallys leg .

    the last word here belongs to the late john connally himself
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4BbVH9NcDA]YouTube - ‪JFK Assassination John & Nellie Connally On Larry King‬‏[/ame]
    i love it when a dreambox comes together.

    Comment

    • enterprise1701
      Top Poster
      • May 2011
      • 107

      #47
      wasnt it said that they never found the round that killed him??

      Comment

      • piopat
        DK Veteran
        • May 2008
        • 708

        #48
        i assume you mean the bullet which killed jfk (the head shot bullet ) that bullet in all likely hood disintegrated .they found lots of fragments big and small on the floor of the limo .
        i love it when a dreambox comes together.

        Comment

        • racin-snake
          V.I.P. Member
          • Jun 2009
          • 2285

          #49
          that's more than a pity as it would have confirmed the calibre of the gun that was used
          clearing up a contentious bit of evidence as the 6.5 mm Carcano and 7.65mm Mauser have a huge amount of difference in calibre and in weight

          and clear up whether it was one or the other used to assassinate a President .....
          Last edited by racin-snake; 31 May, 2011, 19:00.
          Today is the Tomorrow you worried about yesterday ......Was it worth it ?

          Comment

          • piopat
            DK Veteran
            • May 2008
            • 708

            #50
            some of the larger fragments seem to have come from a 6.5 carcano bullet i believe (im no forensic expert so i have to go by the expert testimony ) but there is plenty of other evidence which is problematic .
            i love it when a dreambox comes together.

            Comment

            • jjww
              Newbie
              • Jun 2011
              • 1

              #51
              n'importe quoi...

              Comment

              • piopat
                DK Veteran
                • May 2008
                • 708

                #52
                there are reports of a bullet striking an area near a manhole on the south side of elm street (this is the area on the opposite side of the road from the grassy knoll ) this does not mean a shot from the knoll missed the limo and struck the area near the man hole its more indicative of a shot from the rear from either the tsbd or the daltex building .

                there were reports of a shot that missed the limo and hit the road on the right side of the limo (on the street between the limo and the curb and people saw sparks ,this is before the shot ) as it passed the tsbd ,there is a mark on the pavement on the north side of elm which is all most infront of the tsbd from another shot which oswald could not have fired . not because of lack of bullets (he had left one spare shot in the rifle ) but because the angle makes it a physical impossibility for oswald to have fired it .
                i love it when a dreambox comes together.

                Comment

                • racin-snake
                  V.I.P. Member
                  • Jun 2009
                  • 2285

                  #53
                  Piopat
                  is there anything in the archives you have about the withdrawal
                  off the two secret service men from the rear of the car the president was in at the slowest part of the drive at the corner before deeley plaza ?

                  also.. anything on the circumstances of the flight back to washington of the body off JFK ?

                  any info would be superb

                  just to compare to what ime reading t the moment ..thanks
                  Last edited by racin-snake; 11 June, 2011, 17:48.
                  Today is the Tomorrow you worried about yesterday ......Was it worth it ?

                  Comment

                  • piopat
                    DK Veteran
                    • May 2008
                    • 708

                    #54
                    hi mate are you talking about the two agents at love field (one was henry rybka the other agents name eludes me now ) who were running along either side of jfks limo and were ordered to stop and stay at the airport by emory roberts ?


                    rybka is the guy on the right of the limo with his arms out stretched wondering what the heck is going on .
                    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8"]YouTube - ‪JFK assassination: Secret Service Standdown‬‏[/ame]

                    are you talking about the probable coffin switch ? .
                    Last edited by piopat; 18 June, 2011, 16:32.
                    i love it when a dreambox comes together.

                    Comment

                    • racin-snake
                      V.I.P. Member
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 2285

                      #55
                      thats the ones the coffin switch and the order of the two secret service guys away from the car
                      also what ime reading at the moment has a guy showing the headshot could have been from a storm drain
                      all these seem to be linked to other books ?
                      so just looking at the info before looking for the books in question

                      ile get a link to these other bits of info and post


                      Today is the Tomorrow you worried about yesterday ......Was it worth it ?

                      Comment

                      • piopat
                        DK Veteran
                        • May 2008
                        • 708

                        #56
                        heres a link with lots of info /videos/pictures regarding the secret service agents .
                        Vince Palamara's JFK SECRET SERVICE PRESIDENT KENNEDY Blog: THE REAL TRUTH ABOUT THE KENNEDY DETAIL: Jim DiEugenio re: Vince Palamara in Vince Bugliosi's book

                        here are one or two links regarding the two coffins
                        History Matters Archive - Air Force One Audio Recordings

                        JFK Lancer
                        i love it when a dreambox comes together.

                        Comment

                        • Wolfpack
                          DK Veteran
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 1530

                          #57
                          Give it a rest. Did Oswald shoot Kennedy I don't know but i know the shots came from the book depository and the only reason people keep this thing alive is cause Jack Ruby killed Oswald before he had a chance to defend himself. Ask yourself does it really matter who killed him?

                          Comment

                          • Shady
                            Shite Link King
                            • Dec 2010
                            • 6404

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Wolfpack
                            i know the shots came from the book depository
                            and how do you KNOW this?
                            Fave replies from various threads

                            1: What the fff is all that about??? All that crap below your reply I mean, get a life mate
                            2: no info on google abt the pace sv5 rang asda they have no idea what i was talking about,
                            3: Your total contribution to this forum, bordering on trolling, seems to have been a collection of snipes, one liners & asterisked expletives





                            Comment

                            • piopat
                              DK Veteran
                              • May 2008
                              • 708

                              #59
                              "give it a rest" mate if your not interested in this topic thats fine all you have to do is not read the posts on the thread and not reply to them either .

                              people are keeping the case alive because people were not told the truth in 1963 and that truth is still being suppressed 47 years later . why does it matter ?

                              "Operation Northwoods: In the early 1960s, American military leaders drafted plans to create public support for a war against Cuba, to oust Fidel Castro from power. The plans included committing acts of terrorism in U.S. cities, killing innocent people and U.S. soldiers, blowing up a U.S. ship, assassinating Cuban ?migr?s, sinking boats of Cuban refugees, and hijacking planes. The plans were all approved by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but were reportedly rejected by the civilian leadership, then kept secret for nearly 40 years.

                              Author James Bamford, ***8220;A Pretext For War***8221;, discusses the declassified ***8220;Operation Northwoods***8221; documents revealing that in 1962 the CIA was planning to stage phony terrorist attacks on the US and blame it on Cuba to start a war:"
                              [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IygchZRJVXM&feature=player_embedded]YouTube - ‪Operation Northwoods‬‏[/ame]

                              does any of that sound familliar ? .

                              as i say if you dont care for this topic or dont believe there was a conspiracy thats fine your entitled to your opinion , but i also am entitled to my opinion .
                              i love it when a dreambox comes together.

                              Comment

                              • nara
                                DK Veteran
                                • May 2008
                                • 2586

                                #60
                                Originally posted by piopat
                                .. if you dont care for this topic or dont believe there was a conspiracy thats fine your entitled to your opinion , but i also am entitled to my opinion .
                                Absolutely, I would agree with you 100%.

                                ...on the other hand, this is a forum, people are quite entitled to challenge your opinion and ask you to defend seemingly unproven assertions.

                                If you're looking for a cosy little room where everyone's going to agree with each other you'd be better off in a newsgroup.
                                He who laughs last probably didn't get the joke.

                                Comment

                                Working...