Bedroom tax, new thread !

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thered
    V.I.P. Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 4915

    #31
    Originally posted by Saltire
    lmfao, I cant believe some of the peoples theories about my buisness in this thread, thats why I said "let me deal with that part of it".

    We are taking them to court for the unfair bedroom tax and thats all you need to know, your either for it or against, as for the rest of the funny things some people are saying, just forget all that and let me deal with it.

    I'm here to fight the bedroom tax and thats about it, makes for fun reading though, .

    Thanks again everyone for your comments by the way
    Please do tell


    Properties in one hand and fighting a reduction in housing benefit on the other


    Cant help but sound a tad dodgy and you cant blame anyone else you made the post

    Comment

    • Lainie
      V.I.P. Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 3062

      #32
      few facts

      if you own another property you cannot claim housing benefit

      dwp do not pay full mortgages they only pay the interest bit and then thats capped for xx amount of time.

      all landlords must be registered and have all the correct safety certificates etc

      if you say you are a landlord they will check with hmrc/local government re your income
      sigpic

      Its nice to be important, but it's more important to be nice

      Comment

      • Saltire
        DK Veteran
        • Apr 2008
        • 1361

        #33
        ok, lets say my daughter for example has a spare bedroom in her council house, could be one of my 40 wifes, LMAO, but you get the drift ?

        She says to council, ok I will take a 1 bedroom house, give me one and you can take my house.

        How many 1 bedroom council properties are there available just now or being built out of the 50,000 houses that are SUPPOSED to be getting built in 2013 ???

        I will take a guess, here in scotland, probably about a few 1 bedroom house available to rent, and probably about 1% new one bedroom properties.

        so people wanting to do the right thing and move to a smaller house, how are they going to do that ??? they cant, simple as that !

        There is going to be a lot of homeless people soon because of this and this will force the government into even more debt that they cant afford !

        Idiots, thats what the government are in my opinion.

        Comment

        • GastonJ
          V.I.P. Member
          • Dec 2009
          • 5505

          #34
          If you live in this area, very little:

          Council Housing | South Ayrshire Council

          So through no fault of their own people will be living in houses too large for them, that they will have to pay extra for no doubt. Then again they could all move into bedsits which in turn means private landlords will make more money. Perhaps that's really the idea.
          My master plan is to live forever..... going to plan so far
          Despite the cost of living, it's still very popular.
          No good deed goes unpunished....

          Comment

          • thered
            V.I.P. Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 4915

            #35
            Originally posted by GastonJ
            If you live in this area, very little:

            Council Housing | South Ayrshire Council

            So through no fault of their own people will be living in houses too large for them, that they will have to pay extra for no doubt. Then again they could all move into bedsits which in turn means private landlords will make more money. Perhaps that's really the idea.
            I do agree that there need to be places to move too but surely of the 4700 waiting a good proportion will be able to swap

            Most people on housing lists already have houses they just want bigger ones

            Should be something in place tho if nothing available in area they just get same whack until a house/flat pops up

            Comment

            • Saltire
              DK Veteran
              • Apr 2008
              • 1361

              #36
              Originally posted by thered
              I do agree that there need to be places to move too but surely of the 4700 waiting a good proportion will be able to swap

              Most people on housing lists already have houses they just want bigger ones

              Should be something in place tho if nothing available in area they just get same whack until a house/flat pops up
              4700 , with respect, where did you magic that figure up from mate, we'r talking possibly a million or millions here that would need a one bedroom home ?

              let me know ?

              edit : heres example and these will not be 1 bedroom, I bet maybe 1% of these houses are 1 bedroom >>> Nearly 50,000 new homes will be built in 2013, Nick Clegg pledges | Society | The Guardian

              and how many people in the uk is this going to effect ? millions ! (62,641,000 (2011) ) thats how many people legally live in the uk but thats from 2011 as you can see, I am not sure how many of those are council tenants but you can Imagine, and its probably a heck of a lot more than that now in 2013, not to mention all the Legal immigrants who are sucking the life blood from the uk's finances and normally are put before our own people when it comes to everything as far as I can read into.

              edit 2 : infact I dont even think the houses in that article are council, I think they are private, so its even worse !
              Last edited by Saltire; 25 February, 2013, 03:59. Reason: edit.

              Comment

              • Saltire
                DK Veteran
                • Apr 2008
                • 1361

                #37
                There has been talk of making people who own thier houses to also get taxed for extra rooms too, now, that is something I am in favour of, lets see how all the mansion owners etc like that.

                That would be a brilliant idea if it ever happens because theres that many spare rooms in private houses its unbelievable, and it would ease a lot of pressure on the whole country and its finances

                The source isnt reliable but there is plenty of talk about it on lots of websites and the usual facebook and all that kinda stuff, lets see all the private owners panicking, that would make me happy for the whole of the UK, get all the mansion owners to take in lodgers, see them sweat, .

                Hope its true.

                Comment

                • thered
                  V.I.P. Member
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 4915

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Saltire
                  4700 , with respect, where did you magic that figure up from mate, we'r talking possibly a million or millions here that would need a one bedroom home ?

                  let me know ?
                  From the link gas left

                  If there are millions of people need 1 bed houses or flats sureley there are millions of people waiting on lists like the one gas posted who want bigger houses

                  all the talk is of one bedroom places why??


                  can families not move from 4 and 5 bedroom houses into 2 and 3 bedders as well as 1 bedroom

                  All the focus seems to be on 1 bedroom who said they all need that ?

                  Originally posted by Saltire
                  There has been talk of making people who own thier houses to also get taxed for extra rooms too, now, that is something I am in favour of, lets see how all the mansion owners etc like that.

                  That would be a brilliant idea if it ever happens because theres that many spare rooms in private houses its unbelievable, and it would ease a lot of pressure on the whole country and its finances

                  The source isnt reliable but there is plenty of talk about it on lots of websites and the usual facebook and all that kinda stuff, lets see all the private owners panicking, that would make me happy for the whole of the UK, get all the mansion owners to take in lodgers, see them sweat, .

                  Hope its true.
                  Think thats mansion tax, dont know if its for rooms but its been talked about that houses over certain value will have to pay

                  Not sure the queen will tho

                  Bedroom tax isnt tax its reduction of benefit

                  A tax is something you have to pay

                  Housing benefit is free money towards rent, how is reducing it an illegal tax?


                  Btw not sure if we are getting full picture

                  Originally posted by Saltire
                  There has been talk of making people who own thier houses to also get taxed for extra rooms too, now, that is something I am in favour of, lets see how all the mansion owners etc like that.

                  That would be a brilliant idea if it ever happens because theres that many spare rooms in private houses its unbelievable, and it would ease a lot of pressure on the whole country and its finances

                  You own property yet you are in favour of taxing spare rooms for people who own their homes, yet not in favour of housing benefit cuts to council houses with spare rooms

                  Im no genius but this thread doesnt add up
                  Last edited by thered; 25 February, 2013, 12:52.

                  Comment

                  • jordigirl
                    DK Veteran
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 716

                    #39
                    i dont think you can make home owners pay a bedroom tax - on a home that they already own, if you can afford to purchase a house surely you can decide how many bedrooms you want in it,

                    is this why the council tax is banded?? so different rates for different size and priced houses??







                    Comment

                    • rds60h
                      DK Veteran
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 622

                      #40
                      Originally posted by thered
                      Sounds even more dodgy now


                      Sounds like the right to buy is being used and abused to get a few cheap houses, move in buy

                      rent out to family (free housing benefit pay for house)

                      get another house wait until a year whatever

                      Buy again move out rent to more family get a new house

                      Sounds like property building empire on housing benefit


                      A lot of Asians do this near me

                      You obviously believe they are doing wrong so why don't you report them ?

                      Comment

                      • rds60h
                        DK Veteran
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 622

                        #41
                        Originally posted by GastonJ
                        Hardly unlawful tax.

                        Anyway, even though it certainly won't affect me:

                        1) Why only impose it on easy targets?
                        2) Why only impose it on council house tenants and housing association tenants?

                        That means people who receive benefits and live in private property aren't affected, wonder why - maybe it's because private landlords perhaps tend to vote Tory or Liberal? or that MP's rent out their first homes and make some cash back. Either way it's unfair to not impose it on all who receive benefits.
                        Maybe, just maybe that is what makes it illegal, it is discriminating against a particular sector.

                        Comment

                        • rds60h
                          DK Veteran
                          • Nov 2008
                          • 622

                          #42
                          Originally posted by thered
                          To be fair most mps homes wont be full of dss


                          but i see your point


                          Some would argue its a perk of the job, if you have a home and parliament say you can have another home to enable you to work more freely closer to base

                          why not rent your real home out?

                          Common sense i do not see any wrong in that

                          I would do it i am sure most people would.

                          But if they rent out their own home then it is no longer their primary home and secondly the rent received negates the expense of the "second" home so therefore the expenses are either reduced or no longer required.
                          So the expenses claimed are therefore false.

                          Comment

                          • rds60h
                            DK Veteran
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 622

                            #43
                            Originally posted by flyingpig
                            I am deffo for it and I am a socialist!!!!

                            If you can tell me why taxpayers should pay via their taxes which are paid in the form of benefits to people who don't work to live in houses larger than they require - and you may start to change my mind. Can you say why you are against it??

                            No person who works should pay for people who have never worked, those who don't work, those who cant work, or those who don't want to work to live in larger houses than what their situation deems - That is why I am for it!! Lets hear your side!?!

                            It appears to me you may only be against it because it may affect the money in your pocket and profit.... Not that you are agianst it for any political reason, or they fact that it is trying to make people accountable!!!!
                            So you have worked all your life, lived in the same house since you were married (in some cases it could even be the same house your parents lived in) you have paid rent all that time, the house would have been paid off years ago had you been brave enough to take on a mortgage.
                            You get made redundant and can't find another job or you have been laid off through a debilitating illness and are now unable to work again.
                            Then your eldest child marries and moves out, so you must now move home or try and find extra money to stay where you have always lived ?
                            This is the type of scenario that finds people dying of shock and fear or taking their own lives,
                            is that really fair ?
                            Yes there are people working the system and defrauding it, so shouldn't it be those people who are targeted ?
                            Last edited by rds60h; 25 February, 2013, 21:38. Reason: missed part out

                            Comment

                            • rds60h
                              DK Veteran
                              • Nov 2008
                              • 622

                              #44
                              Originally posted by thered

                              Bedroom tax isnt tax its reduction of benefit

                              A tax is something you have to pay

                              Housing benefit is free money towards rent, how is reducing it an illegal tax?

                              The Benefit will be reduced and the extra will have to be paid............"A Tax is something you pay"
                              So It Is A Tax !!!
                              "Housing Benefit is free money towards rent"..........How is it "Free Money" to those that have worked all their lives and paid into the system ?

                              Don't get me wrong TheRed I understand what you are getting at but not every shoe fits the same foot.
                              It is the scroungers that need to be targeted not the genuine and needy.

                              Comment

                              • Snowy79
                                DK Veteran
                                • Jan 2011
                                • 1347

                                #45
                                I'd have thought anyone living in a council house would still have a tenancy agreement even if it is just a gereric one. Regardless how long you rent a property the council could still legaly cancel the tenancy with prior notice. The same as a private tenency. Just because you lived there for years doesn't mean the owner can't move you out. I've never lived in a council propertyy as an adult so can't say if you have to sign an agreement but if you have you're stuffed in law.

                                All the council are doing is collecting the set rent and the Government are still giving the individual there legal entitlement. No more no less. They're no more being discriminated against than the person living in a one bedroom council house is compared to a single person living in a two bedroom house.

                                Comment

                                Working...