Vu+ Uno and Vu+ Duo Clones to be released by the end of the month

**sakiblateef** · 11 January, 2012, 21:34

Yaoxin are now selling clones for ?195 delivered according to their website.

Still a bit pricey for a clone.

**garry1312** · 11 January, 2012, 21:51

Originally posted by sakiblateef

Yaoxin are now selling clones for ?195 delivered according to their website.

Still a bit pricey for a clone.

That sounds excellent a receiver that has next to no support, hardly tested and from a disgraceful seller superb

**redondo5** · 12 January, 2012, 03:05

Im not sure if support is that important. Obviously reliability is an issue... But if the clones were to stick to just the old images that work currently....i dont think that would be such a bad thing for those users.

Yes, they might not have the latest drivers... But most clone buyers wouldnt mind that too much. As long as they have a reliable twin tuner, with epg and a slick user interface...with some great images out there that do work... Most wont mind. In terms f support most issues could be resolved as long as they stick to the images that work currently. Is there something im missing?

**garry1312** · 12 January, 2012, 09:39

Originally posted by redondo5

Im not sure if support is that important.

Sorry but that is the most insane thing I have read on this thread yet. Support is extremely important. No one is going to learn a thing about there receiver if there is no support out there, support stops people from bricking there receivers.

I am not saying you must go with a original receiver to receive support as there is loads of support for the DM clone receivers.

If anyone buys a receiver and does not give a damn about support or think it is not important you may as well take the cash you are going to use to purchase that receiver and take a lighter to it. Even if you are a Enigma/Enigma2 master (

) you still need support everyone is always learning in this game.

**redondo5** · 12 January, 2012, 17:38

Originally posted by garry1312

Sorry but that is the most insane thing I have read on this thread yet. Support is extremely important. No one is going to learn a thing about there receiver if there is no support out there, support stops people from bricking there receivers.

I am not saying you must go with a original receiver to receive support as there is loads of support for the DM clone receivers.

If anyone buys a receiver and does not give a damn about support or think it is not important you may as well take the cash you are going to use to purchase that receiver and take a lighter to it. Even if you are a Enigma/Enigma2 master (

) you still need support everyone is always learning in this game.

I was just saying "support" is out there whether its officially supported or not. If someone is buying a clone, apart from reliability of the hardware itself....just stick to the old images pre 2012 and dont update... And all the support e.g. How do i do this? Or how do i get epg setup etc. is already out there.

Ive got original duo and im still on vix old image. I do tinker with a few things, but basically like a good stable image with all its benefIts. With most people just wanting a good viewing experiance, i dont see why they cant get that with an older image, for example vix 2.0 as oppose to the latest image with the latest drivers. If they're buying a clone, most likely they want a dual tuner box with great epg without going over their budget... So apart from reliability guarantee from the hardware....shouldnt they still get that with older images? Obviously if they want the latest hardware and drivers etc. dont expect compatibility straight away if at all... But are people who would be buying a clone really after that?

**garry1312** · 12 January, 2012, 18:02

weres the fun in owning a Enigma receiver that you can only ever use a handful of images?

Look at the SE clone for instance may not be a twin tuner but you are spoiled for choice when it comes to images.

Also I keep hearing 'budget receiver' its not much cheaper than the original I dont understand why anyone even if all they had right now was ?200 why they would not rather hold off for a month or two put some money by and go with the real deal?

What I do not get is why there is people buying this receiver right now, it has not been properly tested. No owner of this receiver right now can say the hardware looks like it will last a reasonable time.

Be better taking that ?200 and taking it down to the bookies, if any luck win then buy the original. Rather than gambling that ?200 on a receiver that no one knows in what direction it is going to go.

**Data7** · 12 January, 2012, 18:45

I tell you what gerry for someone who is soposed to be unbiased you talk a lot of crap. you say dont buy these clones just buy dreambox clone you say it is not worth buying these clones for an extra ?120 you can have a original. you said there are not many images for these boxes. for your info apart from the solo's there is no shortage of working images. every image before 2012 will work it will only be the new drivers that require a new cfe file that might need patching to get them to work. there are more quality images for duos than any crapy dreambox. quality is quality unlike the value for money by dreambox multi media.

**Manic01** · 12 January, 2012, 19:21

Good info mate and true!

**garry1312** · 12 January, 2012, 19:41

Originally posted by Data7

I tell you what gerry for someone who is soposed to be unbiased you talk a lot of crap. you say dont buy these clones just buy dreambox clone you say it is not worth buying these clones for an extra ?120 you can have a original. you said there are not many images for these boxes. for your info apart from the solo's there is no shortage of working images. every image before 2012 will work it will only be the new drivers that require a new cfe file that might need patching to get them to work. there are more quality images for duos than any crapy dreambox. quality is quality unlike the value for money by dreambox multi media.

For a start it is Garry maybe you should invest in a pair of glasses.

Quality listen to yourself you dont even know the quality of these receivers they have hardly been on the scene for anytime what so ever. Clearly you have forked out the money for one and are defending it good for you, the end of the day I can still have my say and my say is anyone that buys one of these receivers right now is no more than a guinnea pig.

As for it having more images than for instance the SE clone (which may I note there are Vu+ Duo images for it) I suggest that you seriously need to do your research.

Ooh and on another note Ferarri sim are behind these receivers never been the most popular have they? and there receivers in the past have had issues.

As for being completely for Dream receivers and no other once you have invested in a pair of glasses look at my receiver list theres a receiver in there that is not a Dream clone.

'quality is quality' that statement would make sense if you was talking about the original.

**alom5** · 12 January, 2012, 19:46

I agree with Garry. Too pricey for a clone that is......after all on trial.

Let's not get so heated on the subject....everyone is entitled to their opinion.

**lagerland** · 12 January, 2012, 19:52

Yeah what was question again anyway im with gerry on this one....................

**garry1312** · 12 January, 2012, 19:57

Gerry has spoken

**Data7** · 12 January, 2012, 20:00

Originally posted by garry1312

For a start it is Garry maybe you should invest in a pair of glasses.

Quality listen to yourself you dont even know the quality of these receivers they have hardly been on the scene for anytime what so ever. Clearly you have forked out the money for one and are defending it good for you, the end of the day I can still have my say and my say is anyone that buys one of these receivers right now is no more than a guinnea pig.

As for it having more images than for instance the SE clone (which may I note there are Vu+ Duo images for it) I suggest that you seriously need to do your research.

Ooh and on another note Ferarri sim are behind these receivers never been the most popular have they? and there receivers in the past have had issues.

As for being completely for Dream receivers and no other once you have invested in a pair of glasses look at my receiver list theres a receiver in there that is not a Dream clone.

'quality is quality' that statement would make sense if you was talking about the original.

Whoopee furkin do m8. Well garry. let us go threw the list of crap you came back with. Yes I have invested my money with these chinese clones. But just a side note I have 2 other proper duos. a dm8000 amiko spiderbox 9000 blade 7000 gigablue 800solo. loads of very shite dm500. couple of crappy dm800 clones and a proper dm800. so I do know a little about enigma1 and 2 boxes clone and original. yes you have a etrend 9200 whoopee. try buying one of every other box out there try them all out and then come back to me. as for you calling ferrari.funny ferrari on the dreambox front allows original images just by changing the second stage bootloader not like sim 2 bollox cant do that have to modify the original to run on there boxes I know which box I will have.

and as to quality you are telling me that all clone dreamboxes are perfect never go faulty no crapy build quality. but like you say we will see. what the quality is. let us look at what these boxes are based on dreambox questionable quality on the original look at the dm800 to start with not brilliant. let us look at the vu duo straight out of the blocks perfect build quality no build issuse. blew dreambox straight out of the water. so let us recap clone dm boxes based on a flawed concept clone duo's basted on a rock solid build quality. I will take my chances on the ferrari clone duo's. show me a image group that supply images for dm800's that dont have an image for duo's.

**bj1** · 12 January, 2012, 20:01

handbags at 10 paces.....

**garry1312** · 12 January, 2012, 20:10

Well for a start Ferarri have built poor quality receivers in the past.

Nice to see you got your glasses out to do some reading.

Never had a single problem with any of my Dream receivers apart from one 800 I bought that had to go back after a week..... guess what it was a ferarri receiver

. Ferarri are well known for as cheap as you can possibly get hardware. So I would rather have SIM theres a reason why there the most popular!

Ooh and dissing a 500 theres nothing at all wrong with a 500 a very popular receiver for anyone that just wants SD.

Also you are forgetting the fact that Vu+ Clarke Tech etc would not be were they are if it was not for Dream.

You are clearly someone with a serious attitude problem, that does not allow others to have there own say. To be honest I am just going to ignore what you say now because to be honest your attitude stinks and finding the need to swear go you big man

Vu+ Uno and Vu+ Duo Clones to be released by the end of the month

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment